Veerammal and Others Vs. Vasantha and Others

Veerammal and Others vs Vasantha and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Sep 23, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1188166
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: D. Krishnakumar
Decided On: Sep 23, 2016
Case Number: C.M.A(MD)No. 959 of 2005
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Veerammal and Others

Respondent

Vasantha and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: civil miscellaneous appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 against the (award)judgment and decree made in m.c.o.p.no.1 of 1992, dated 16.3.2004, on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal(sub-court), periyakulam.) 1. when the matter came up for hearing on 22.09.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants/claimants and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ''for dismissal''. even today, also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. the learned counsel for the second respondent is present. 2. in view of the same, the civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the (Award)Judgment and Decree made in M.C.O.P.No.1 of 1992, dated 16.3.2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Sub-Court), Periyakulam.)

1. When the matter came up for hearing on 22.09.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants/Claimants and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ''for dismissal''. Even today, also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The learned counsel for the second respondent is present.

2. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Veerammal and Others vs Vasantha and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge D. Krishnakumar