Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Solai Thevar Vs. The Assistant Settlement Officer (South) Chepauk, Chennai and Others

A. Solai Thevar vs The Assistant Settlement Officer (South) Chepauk, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 26, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187595

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD)No. 13123 of 2010 & M.P(MD)No. 2 of 2010 & 2870 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Solai Thevar

Respondent

The Assistant Settlement Officer (South) Chepauk, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 31.05.2010 in na.ka.a1/299/2006 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal.) 1. this writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 31.05.2010, in na.ka.a1/299/2006 passed by the first respondent. 2. heard both sides. 3. in the impugned order, it is stated that against the impugned order, right of appeal before land tax officer, chennai, within a period of 30 days. in spite of that, the petitioner filed this writ petition in the year 2010 and the same is pending. hence, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate forum within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. on such filing of the appeal, the authority concerned shall consider without taking the delay into account and dispose of the appeal within a period of three months thereafter. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 31.05.2010 in Na.Ka.A1/299/2006 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal.)

1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 31.05.2010, in Na.Ka.A1/299/2006 passed by the first respondent.

2. Heard both sides.

3. In the impugned order, it is stated that against the impugned order, right of appeal before Land Tax Officer, Chennai, within a period of 30 days. In spite of that, the petitioner filed this writ petition in the year 2010 and the same is pending. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate forum within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such filing of the appeal, the authority concerned shall consider without taking the delay into account and dispose of the appeal within a period of three months thereafter. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial