Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sea Hawk Lines Private Limited

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 03, 2016
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187488

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Comp.Appl.Nos. 975 of 2016
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394 -

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Excerpt

companies act, 1956 - sections 391 to 394 - .....accepts notice. 2. i am informed that advance copy was served on the regional director (in short rd ). 2.1. there is, however, no appearance on behalf of the rd. 3. since the applicant seeks correction of typographical errors, i am of the view, the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the rd cannot affect the outcome of this application. this is more so, as the rd is yet to file his report, qua the proposed scheme. 4. insofar as the official liquidator is concerned, he says that since, correction, which is sought in the proposed scheme, pertains to typographical errors, he would not want to file a reply and, would, even otherwise, have no objection to the prayer made in the application being allowed. 5. as per the averments made in the application, the error in the proposed scheme and the corrections, sought for, are set out in a table. the said table is extracted herein below, for the sake of convenience. sl.no.cl. in the schemeexisting matterto be corrected as/inserted11.2rs.20,00,0002,00,000 equity sharesrs.2,00,00,00020,00,000 equity shares21.4rs.36,00,0203,60,002 equity sharesrs.36,00,2003,60,020 equity shares34.3293(1)(d)180(1)(c)47.57.601-04-1201-04-1201-04-1501-04-15511section 81(1a) s.16,31 and 94 or any other provision of the actsection 62(1)(c)s.13, 14, or 61 or any other provision of the companies act, 2013615...the amalgamation of the transferor company with the transferee company in accordance with this scheme will be in compliance with the provisions of s.2(1b) of the income tax act, 1961. the amalgamation is in the nature of merger as defined in para 3(e) of the accounting standard (as) 14 as prescribedby the institute of chartered accountants of india. the method of accounting which will be adopted in the amalgamation under as 14 will be pooling of interest method.71731-3-20161-4-2017 6. given the aforesaid circumstances, the prayer made in the application is allowed. 7. the applicant will file an amended scheme within one (1) week.....

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Application filed Rules 9 and 11(b) of the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 read with Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956)

1. Issue notice. Mr.Ramaiah, the Official Liquidator accepts notice. 2. I am informed that advance copy was served on the Regional Director (in short RD ).

2.1. There is, however, no appearance on behalf of the RD.

3. Since the applicant seeks correction of typographical errors, I am of the view, the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the RD cannot affect the outcome of this application. This is more so, as the RD is yet to file his report, qua the proposed scheme.

4. Insofar as the Official Liquidator is concerned, he says that since, correction, which is sought in the proposed scheme, pertains to typographical errors, he would not want to file a reply and, would, even otherwise, have no objection to the prayer made in the application being allowed.

5. As per the averments made in the application, the error in the proposed scheme and the corrections, sought for, are set out in a table. The said table is extracted herein below, for the sake of convenience.

Sl.No.Cl. in the SchemeExisting matterTo be corrected as/inserted
11.2Rs.20,00,0002,00,000 Equity SharesRs.2,00,00,00020,00,000 Equity Shares
21.4Rs.36,00,0203,60,002 Equity SharesRs.36,00,2003,60,020 Equity Shares
34.3293(1)(d)180(1)(c)
47.57.601-04-1201-04-1201-04-1501-04-15
511Section 81(1A) S.16,31 and 94 or any other provision of the ActSection 62(1)(c)S.13, 14, or 61 or any other provision of the Companies Act, 2013
615...The amalgamation of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company in accordance with this Scheme will be in compliance with the provisions of S.2(1B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The amalgamation is in the nature of merger as defined in Para 3(e) of the Accounting Standard (AS) 14 as prescribedby the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The method of accounting which will be adopted in the amalgamation under AS 14 will be Pooling of interest method.
71731-3-20161-4-2017
6. Given the aforesaid circumstances, the prayer made in the application is allowed.

7. The applicant will file an amended scheme within one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed today.

8. The amended scheme will be served on the RD, as well as the Official Liquidator.

9.The Registry will despatch a copy of this order both to the RD, as well as the Official Liquidator,without insistence on process fee.

10. The application is, accordingly, closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial