S. Aruna Devi Vs. The Director of School Education and Others

S. Aruna Devi vs The Director of School Education and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 22, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187305

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1187305
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M.V. Muralidaran
Decided On: Nov 22, 2016
Case Number: W.P.(MD) No. 3207 of 2011 & M.P(MD) No. 1 of 2011
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Aruna Devi

Respondent

The Director of School Education and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a graduate assistant in the tamil subject in the m.b.c.category with in the stipulated period which this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner already appointed during the pendency of the writ petition. 2. recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a Graduate Assistant in the Tamil Subject in the M.B.C.category with in the stipulated period which this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner already appointed during the pendency of the writ petition.

2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S. Aruna Devi vs The Director of School Education and Others Same Subject Education Same Judge M.V. Muralidaran