Karuppiah Vs. K. Subbiah and Another

Karuppiah vs K. Subbiah and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 17, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1187062
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: S.M. Subramaniam
Decided On: Nov 17, 2016
Case Number: C.M.A (MD) No. 1588 of 2006
Subject: Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue: Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karuppiah

Respondent

K. Subbiah and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: civil miscellaneous appeal filed under section 173(1) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, to prefer this memorandum of grounds of civil miscellaneous petition against the judgment and decreetal order passed in m.c.o.p.no.160 of 2002, dated 18/2/2004 on the file of the learned subordinate judge, motor accidents claims tribunal pudukottai.) when the civil miscellaneous petition came up for hearing on 16.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence, the civil miscellaneous petition is directed to be listed on 17.11.2016, under the caption for dismissal . even today, there is no representation for the appellant. hence, the civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to prefer this Memorandum of grounds of Civil Miscellaneous petition against the Judgment and decreetal order passed in M.C.O.P.No.160 of 2002, dated 18/2/2004 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Pudukottai.)

When the Civil Miscellaneous petition came up for hearing on 16.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is directed to be listed on 17.11.2016, under the caption for dismissal . Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Karuppiah vs K. Subbiah and Another Same Subject Motor Vehicles Same Judge S.M. Subramaniam