Narayanan Vs. Mayandi

Narayanan vs Mayandi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 30, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186737

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186737
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: D. Krishnakumar
Decided On: Nov 30, 2016
Case Number: C.R.P (PD) (MD) No. 1418 of 2009 & M.P (MD) No. 1 of 2009

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayanan

Respondent

Mayandi

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Excerpt

(prayer: civil revision petition filed under section 115 of the civil procedure code praying this court to call for the records from the lower court, hear the appellant, set aside the order passed by the learned district munsif, thirumangalam made in i.a.no.122 of 2009, dated6.7.2009 and allow the petition by condoning the delay of 174 days in filing the petition to set aside the orders made in i.a.no.787 of 2005 in o.s.no.197 of 2004 on the file of the learned district munsif, thirumangalam.)order 1. the petitioner as well as the respondent and their respective counsels present before this court. both the parties have represented before this court that they have settled the matter out of court and have also filed a memo of compromise to that effect. 2. in view of the above, the civil revision petition is disposed of in terms of compromise memo. the compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to call for the records from the lower Court, hear the appellant, set aside the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam made in I.A.No.122 of 2009, dated6.7.2009 and allow the Petition by condoning the delay of 174 days in filing the petition to set aside the orders made in I.A.No.787 of 2005 in O.S.No.197 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam.)

ORDER

1. The Petitioner as well as the respondent and their respective counsels present before this Court. Both the parties have represented before this Court that they have settled the matter out of Court and have also filed a memo of compromise to that effect.

2. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in terms of compromise memo. The Compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.