Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narayanan Vs. Mayandi

Narayanan vs Mayandi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 30, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.R.P (PD) (MD) No. 1418 of 2009 & M.P (MD) No. 1 of 2009
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayanan

Respondent

Mayandi

Excerpt

(prayer: civil revision petition filed under section 115 of the civil procedure code praying this court to call for the records from the lower court, hear the appellant, set aside the order passed by the learned district munsif, thirumangalam made in i.a.no.122 of 2009, dated6.7.2009 and allow the petition by condoning the delay of 174 days in filing the petition to set aside the orders made in i.a.no.787 of 2005 in o.s.no.197 of 2004 on the file of the learned district munsif, thirumangalam.)order 1. the petitioner as well as the respondent and their respective counsels present before this court. both the parties have represented before this court that they have settled the matter out of court and have also filed a memo of compromise to that effect. 2. in view of the above, the civil revision petition is disposed of in terms of compromise memo. the compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to call for the records from the lower Court, hear the appellant, set aside the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam made in I.A.No.122 of 2009, dated6.7.2009 and allow the Petition by condoning the delay of 174 days in filing the petition to set aside the orders made in I.A.No.787 of 2005 in O.S.No.197 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam.)

ORDER

1. The Petitioner as well as the respondent and their respective counsels present before this Court. Both the parties have represented before this Court that they have settled the matter out of Court and have also filed a memo of compromise to that effect.

2. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in terms of compromise memo. The Compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial