M. Pappathi Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul

M. Pappathi vs The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 08, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186539

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186539
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: K. Ravichandrabaabu
Decided On: Dec 08, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD)No. 23797 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M. Pappathi

Respondent

The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul

Excerpt

(prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.11.2016 and take necessary action to issue the patta in the petitioner's name within the time stipulated by this court.) 1. the petitioner seeks for disposal of his representation, dated 16.11.2016, wherein and whereby he sought for transfer of patta in respect of the land in dispute, which is admittedly standing in the name of one bose, who is said to be the brother of the petitioner's husband. the said person has not added as party respondent in this writ petition. however, considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.11.2016 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the said person, by name, bose, or any other interested parties. the respondent shall pass such an order within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 2. with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.11.2016 and take necessary action to issue the patta in the petitioner's name within the time stipulated by this Court.)

1. The petitioner seeks for disposal of his representation, dated 16.11.2016, wherein and whereby he sought for transfer of patta in respect of the land in dispute, which is admittedly standing in the name of one Bose, who is said to be the brother of the petitioner's husband. The said person has not added as party respondent in this writ petition. However, considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.11.2016 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the said person, by name, Bose, or any other interested parties. The respondent shall pass such an order within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

2. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties M. Pappathi vs The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul Distric... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge K. Ravichandrabaabu