S. Saravanan Vs. The District Collector and Others

S. Saravanan vs The District Collector and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 09, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186508

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186508
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: K. Ravichandrabaabu
Decided On: Dec 09, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD) No. 4337 of 2015
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Saravanan

Respondent

The District Collector and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to sanction a sum of rs. 10,00,000/- to carry out the proposal of the petitioner which was recommended by the district task force committee dated 30.10.2013 for running and setting up the digital flex printing under pegp scheme and pass such further or other orders.) 1. the petitioner seeks for a mandamus for sanctioning of the loan of rs.10,00,000/-. 2. it is submitted by the learned special government pleader appearing for the respondents that the petitioner's application was rejected by an order dated 12.04.2014 itself for the reasons stated thereunder. if that be the case, it is for the petitioner to challenge the said order in a manner known to law. 3. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that no such order is communicated to the petitioner so far. 4. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to communicate the order of rejection to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. on receipt of such order, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in a manner known to law. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to sanction a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- to carry out the proposal of the petitioner which was recommended by the District Task Force Committee dated 30.10.2013 for running and setting up the Digital Flex Printing under PEGP Scheme and pass such further or other orders.)

1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus for sanctioning of the loan of Rs.10,00,000/-.

2. It is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the petitioner's application was rejected by an order dated 12.04.2014 itself for the reasons stated thereunder. If that be the case, it is for the petitioner to challenge the said order in a manner known to law.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that no such order is communicated to the petitioner so far.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to communicate the order of rejection to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such order, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in a manner known to law. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S. Saravanan vs The District Collector and Others Same Subject Education Same Judge K. Ravichandrabaabu