Subramanian Vs. The District Collector, Trichy and Others

Subramanian vs The District Collector, Trichy and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 14, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186455

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186455
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: K. Ravichandrabaabu
Decided On: Dec 14, 2016
Case Number: W.P(MD) No. 23906 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subramanian

Respondent

The District Collector, Trichy and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to take necessary action and to issue patta to the petitioner for 2 acres and 55 cents for the lands in s.no.174, situated at valasiramani village, musiri taluk, trichy district by considering the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.no.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013 within the time frame fixed by this court.) 1. the petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to issue patta in his name in respect of the subject-matter land. 2. mr.a.muthukaruppan, learned additional government pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. by consent of both parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. it appears that the petitioner has already made a representation 8.2.2016 to the first respondent and the same was forwarded to the fourth respondent for further action and the fourth respondent by his proceedings in na.ka.no.988/2013, dated 28.3.2013, requested the second respondent to resurvey the subject-matter land. now the petitioner has filed the present writ petition to consider the claim of the petitioner based on the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.no.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013, within the time frame fixed by this court. 5. accordingly, without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner based on the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.no.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the rival claimants as well, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to take necessary action and to issue patta to the Petitioner for 2 acres and 55 cents for the lands in S.No.174, situated at Valasiramani Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District by considering the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013 within the time frame fixed by this Court.)

1. The Petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to issue patta in his name in respect of the subject-matter land.

2. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

4. It appears that the Petitioner has already made a representation 8.2.2016 to the first respondent and the same was forwarded to the fourth respondent for further action and the fourth respondent by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.988/2013, dated 28.3.2013, requested the second respondent to resurvey the subject-matter land. Now the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition to consider the claim of the Petitioner based on the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

5. Accordingly, without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the claim of the Petitioner based on the report of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.988 of 2013, dated 28.3.2013, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the rival claimants as well, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Subramanian vs The District Collector, Trichy and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge K. Ravichandrabaabu