Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mekala Vs. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India and Another

Mekala vs The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 19, 2016
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186373

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD)No. 17677 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mekala

Respondent

The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to cancel the mortgage with respect to the petitioners properties in housing loan account number 10832985088 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to return the original tittle deeds with regard to his properties in balakrishnapuram village of dindigul taluk and district in s.f.no. 137a/1 plot nos. 11 and 12 considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2016 within time frame as fixed by this hon'ble court.) 1. the petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the second respondent to cancel the mortgage with respect her properties in housing loan account number 10832985088 and consequently directing the second respondent to return the original tittle deeds with regard to his properties in balakrishnapuram village of dindigul taluk and district in s.f.no. 137a/1 plot nos. 11 and 12 considering her representation dated 01.08.2016. 2. today, the second respondent bank filed a memo dated 17.12.2016, wherein, it is stated as follows:- it is submitted that, our bank will deliver the documents to title to the petitioner and the same may be recorded and thus render justice. 3.recording the above statement made by the second respondent, this writ petition is disposed by directing the second respondent bank to return the documents of title to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to cancel the Mortgage with respect to the Petitioners properties in Housing Loan Account Number 10832985088 and consequently directing the 2nd Respondent to return the original Tittle Deeds with regard to his properties in Balakrishnapuram Village of Dindigul Taluk and District in S.F.No. 137A/1 Plot Nos. 11 and 12 considering the Petitioner's Representation dated 01.08.2016 within time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.)

1. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the second respondent to cancel the Mortgage with respect her properties in Housing Loan Account Number 10832985088 and consequently directing the second respondent to return the original Tittle Deeds with regard to his properties in Balakrishnapuram Village of Dindigul Taluk and District in S.F.No. 137A/1 Plot Nos. 11 and 12 considering her representation dated 01.08.2016.

2. Today, the second respondent bank filed a memo dated 17.12.2016, wherein, it is stated as follows:-

It is submitted that, our bank will deliver the documents to title to the petitioner and the same may be recorded and thus render justice.

3.Recording the above statement made by the second respondent, this writ petition is disposed by directing the second respondent bank to return the documents of title to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial