Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V. Kesavan Vs. Ramesh Chand Meena, Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development Department, Chennai and Others

V. Kesavan vs Ramesh Chand Meena, Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development Department, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Dec 21, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186321

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P (MD) No. 1711 of 2014 in W.P. (MD) No. 7355 of 2014
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Article 11- Contempt - Petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition against Respondents/Contemnors and obtained order against Respondents As Respondents had willfully disobeyed order of Court Hence this Contempt Petition Court Held As order passed in above Writ Petition has been ...

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Kesavan

Respondent

Ramesh Chand Meena, Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Rural Development Department, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

contempt of courts act, 1971 - article 11- contempt - petitioner had earlier filed writ petition against respondents/contemnors and obtained order against respondents as respondents had willfully disobeyed order of court hence this contempt petition court held as order passed in above writ petition has been complied with by concerned department by passing necessary order as copy of said order had been produced and recorded contempt petition was closed. (prayer: contempt petition filed under article 11 of contempt of courts act, praying this court to punish the respondents for their delberate and wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court in w.p(md)no.7355 of 2014 dated 30.6.2014) 1. it is represented by both sides that the order passed in the above writ petition has been complied with by passing g.o.no.439, rural development and panchayat raj(u.aa.4) department, dated 19.10.2016 and also produced a copy of the same before this court. 2. recording the above said submission, the contempt petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Article 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the respondents for their delberate and wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.7355 of 2014 dated 30.6.2014)

1. It is represented by both sides that the order passed in the above Writ Petition has been complied with by passing G.O.No.439, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj(U.Aa.4) Department, dated 19.10.2016 and also produced a copy of the same before this Court.

2. Recording the above said submission, the Contempt Petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial