Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

ITC Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

ITC Limited and Another vs Union of India and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Nagpur Decided Apr 25, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1184669

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai Nagpur High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Writ Petition No. 313 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ITC Limited and Another

Respondent

Union of India and Others

Excerpt

p.c. 1. leave to correct the nomenclature of respondent no.4. correction be carried out during the course of the day. issue notice to the respondents returnable on 7.6.2016. 2. prima facie, we are of the view that the notification would apply prospectively, i.e. from 1.4.2016 and the restriction in the notification imposed would apply to manufacture of the goods. as such, prima facie we are of the view that the restriction would apply only to such of the goods which are manufactured from 1.4.2016. 3. in that view of the matter, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) with a clarification that the said interim relief shall apply only to such of the goods which are manufactured prior to 1.4.2016. 4. mrs. mugdha chandurkar, learned advocate waives notice for respondent no.1. 5. mr. d.p. thakare, learned addl. p.p. waives notice for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4.

Full Judgment

P.C.

1. Leave to correct the nomenclature of respondent no.4. Correction be carried out during the course of the day. Issue notice to the respondents returnable on 7.6.2016.

2. Prima facie, we are of the view that the notification would apply prospectively, i.e. from 1.4.2016 and the restriction in the notification imposed would apply to manufacture of the goods. As such, prima facie we are of the view that the restriction would apply only to such of the goods which are manufactured from 1.4.2016.

3. In that view of the matter, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) with a clarification that the said interim relief shall apply only to such of the goods which are manufactured prior to 1.4.2016.

4. Mrs. Mugdha Chandurkar, learned Advocate waives notice for respondent no.1.

5. Mr. D.P. Thakare, learned Addl. P.P. waives notice for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial