Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gracy Thomas Vs. State of Kerala, represented by The Govt. Pleader/Public Prosecutor and Others

Gracy Thomas vs State of Kerala, represented by The Govt. Pleader/Public Prosecutor and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 28, 2015
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1181847

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP (C) No. 28606 of 2015 (A)
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 318 - Abkari Act - Section 8(1), Section 8 (2),Section 55(a) - Contempt - husband of Petitioner/Accused against case was registered for offences punishable under Sections 55(a) and 8 (1) and (2) of Act - Court held - procedure contemplated under Section 318 Cr.P.C. have to be compl...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gracy Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala, represented by The Govt. Pleader/Public Prosecutor and Others

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 318 - abkari act - section 8(1), section 8 (2),section 55(a) - contempt - husband of petitioner/accused against case was registered for offences punishable under sections 55(a) and 8 (1) and (2) of act - court held - procedure contemplated under section 318 cr.p.c. have to be complied with in this case - if proceedings result in a conviction, court below shall forward entire proceedings to this court with a report of circumstances of case under section 318 cr.p.c - writ petition disposed of. para 3 comparative citations: 2015 (4) klt 99 (sn) (c.no.125), 2016 crlj 412, 2015 (5) khc 110, 1. the husband of the petitioner is the accused in s.c.no.176/2004 of the sessions court, thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under sections 55(a) and 8 (1) and (2) of the abkari act. 2. according to the petitioner, the accused is suffering from 80% disability and has become paralytic. it is also the case of the petitioner that the accused cannot understand any proceedings in court and is incapable of defending the case. it has been pointed out that he suffers from dementia and impaired cognition. the consultant physician of the general hospital, neyyattinkara has reported that the petitioner suffers from dementia and impaired cognition with 50% neurological disability. the learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that last time the accused was taken to the court by an ambulance and immediately he was enlarged on bail also. of course, for framing charges, the presence of the accused is required. for all other postings of the case, the court below shall dispense with the personal appearance of the accused. 3. on going through the facts and circumstances of the case, it seems that the procedure contemplated under section 318 cr.p.c. have to be complied with in this case. if the proceedings result in a conviction, the court below shall forward the entire proceedings to this court with a report of the circumstances of the case under section 318 cr.p.c. with the said direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

1. The husband of the petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.176/2004 of the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 55(a) and 8 (1) and (2) of the Abkari Act.

2. According to the petitioner, the accused is suffering from 80% disability and has become paralytic. It is also the case of the petitioner that the accused cannot understand any proceedings in court and is incapable of defending the case. It has been pointed out that he suffers from dementia and impaired cognition. The consultant physician of the General Hospital, Neyyattinkara has reported that the petitioner suffers from dementia and impaired cognition with 50% neurological disability. The learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that last time the accused was taken to the court by an ambulance and immediately he was enlarged on bail also. Of course, for framing charges, the presence of the accused is required. For all other postings of the case, the court below shall dispense with the personal appearance of the accused.

3. On going through the facts and circumstances of the case, it seems that the procedure contemplated under Section 318 Cr.P.C. have to be complied with in this case. If the proceedings result in a conviction, the court below shall forward the entire proceedings to this Court with a report of the circumstances of the case under Section 318 Cr.P.C. With the said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial