Renuga and Another Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Karur District

Renuga and Another vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Karur District

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 16, 2015

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179278

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1179278
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala
Decided On: Oct 16, 2015
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos. 11780 of 2009 to 11786 of 2009 & 11981 of 2009 & M.P.(MD)Nos. 2 of 2009 & 3 of 2009
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Renuga and Another

Respondent

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Karur District

Excerpt

.....is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in c.c.no.70 of 2008 on the file of the hon'ble special court established under tamil nadu protection of interest of depositors (in financial establishment) act cases, madurai and quash the same.) common order 1. the petitioners have come forward with these applications for quashing the respective charge sheets on the file of the special court, established under tamil nadu protection of interest of depositors (in financial establishment) act cases, madurai, raising two grounds that charge sheets have been filed against 38 persons stating that all are responsible for the administration of the firm, but they are not produced any documents to show that how they are responsible. secondly, at the time of filing the final reports, the validity of the enactment has been under challenge before the hon'ble apex court. 2. i have heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. during the course of arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the validity of the enactment has been upheld by the hon'ble apex court and therefore, he prays for early disposal of the cases, pending before the said court. adding further, the learned counsel would submit that the personal appearance of the petitioners may be dispensed with. 4. in the light of the above, the criminal original petitions are dismissed and the learned special judge, special court, established under tamil nadu protection of interest of depositors (in financial establishment) act cases, madurai, is directed to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible. the learned special judge is also directed to consider the applications to be filed by the petitioners for dispensing with their personal appearance, on merits and in accordance with law. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.70 of 2008 on the file of the Hon'ble Special Court established under Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act Cases, Madurai and quash the same.)

Common Order

1. The petitioners have come forward with these applications for quashing the respective charge sheets on the file of the Special Court, established under Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act Cases, Madurai, raising two grounds that charge sheets have been filed against 38 persons stating that all are responsible for the administration of the Firm, but they are not produced any documents to show that how they are responsible. Secondly, at the time of filing the final reports, the validity of the enactment has been under challenge before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

2. I have heard the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the validity of the enactment has been upheld by the Hon'ble Apex Court and therefore, he prays for early disposal of the cases, pending before the said Court. Adding further, the learned counsel would submit that the personal appearance of the petitioners may be dispensed with.

4. In the light of the above, the Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed and the learned Special Judge, Special Court, established under Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act Cases, Madurai, is directed to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible. The learned Special Judge is also directed to consider the applications to be filed by the petitioners for dispensing with their personal appearance, on merits and in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2015 Same Parties Renuga and Another vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Poli... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala

Land Acquisition In accordance with law special judge come forward Reports, The Relating to dispose of Has been