Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh and Others Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thanjavur and Another

Rajesh and Others vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thanjavur and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 15, 2015
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179256

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL. O.P. (MD) No. 19960 of 2015
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh and Others

Respondent

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thanjavur and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. praying to call for the records relating to c.c.no.192 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, pattukkottai and quash the same.) 1. the quash petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to call for the records relating to c.c.no.192 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, pattukkottai and quash the same. 2. it is seen that the alleged offences attributed against the petitioners are under sections 294(b), 324, 323 and 506(ii) of the indian penal code. when the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners and the second respondent appeared in person and their identification is also verified by this court and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent filed a memo of compromise stating that since the matter has been compromised, the second respondent agreed to quash the above said case in connection with c.c.no.192 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, pattukkottai. 3. considering the nature of allegation and also considering the memo of compromise filed by the petitioners and the second respondent, this court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by further proceeding in the matter. therefore, the entire proceedings in c.c.no.192 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, pattukkottai, is hereby quashed and this criminal original petition is allowed accordingly. the joint compromise memo shall form part of the order of this court.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to C.C.No.192 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai and quash the same.)

1. The quash petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to call for the records relating to C.C.No.192 of 2015, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai and quash the same.

2. It is seen that the alleged offences attributed against the petitioners are under Sections 294(b), 324, 323 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners and the second respondent appeared in person and their identification is also verified by this Court and the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent filed a memo of compromise stating that since the matter has been compromised, the second respondent agreed to quash the above said case in connection with C.C.No.192 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai.

3. Considering the nature of allegation and also considering the memo of compromise filed by the petitioners and the second respondent, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by further proceeding in the matter. Therefore, the entire proceedings in C.C.No.192 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai, is hereby quashed and this Criminal Original Petition is allowed accordingly. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the order of this Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial