Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R. Venkatachalam Vs. R. Singaram

R. Venkatachalam vs R. Singaram

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 13, 2015
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 20000 of 2014 & M.P(MD).Nos. 1 & 2 of 2014
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R. Venkatachalam

Respondent

R. Singaram

Excerpt

(prayer:criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. praying to quash the c.c.no.24/2006 on the file of the judicial magistrate court no.ii, trichirappalli.) 1. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. in view of the endorsement, made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the C.C.No.24/2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Trichirappalli.)

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial