Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P. Ramu Vs. Vijayendra S. Bidari, The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

P. Ramu vs Vijayendra S. Bidari, The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 15, 2015
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179141

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Contempt Petition No. 300 of 2015
Subject
Contempt of Court

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Courts Act - Section 11 -

Key legal issue
Contempt of Court

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Ramu

Respondent

Vijayendra S. Bidari, The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

Excerpt

contempt of courts act - section 11 -(prayer:- contempt petition is filed under section 11 of contempt of courts act praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and punish them for the willful disobedience of the order of this hon'ble high court in crl.o.p(md).no.21450 of 2014 dated 01.12.2014.) 1. the petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition stating that even though the order dated 01.12.2014 directing the respondents to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner, the respondents have not provided police protection. after issuing notice to the contemnors, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition. 2. the respondents filed a counter and a typed set of papers stating that on 10.12.2014, an order has been passed by the superintendent of police, madurai district, directing the inspector of police namely sugumar, checkkanurani police station, madurai district, to give police protection to the petitioner and his family. the contemnor has also produced the general diary which shows that one police constable has been deputed for protection to the petitioner and his family. 3. considering the submissions of the respondent and also general diary produced today, the contemnor has complied with the order passed by this court and there is no wilfull disobedience of the order and there is no elements of contempt. hence, the contempt petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnors/Respondents and punish them for the willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble High Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.21450 of 2014 dated 01.12.2014.)

1. The petitioner has come forward with this Contempt Petition stating that even though the order dated 01.12.2014 directing the respondents to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner, the respondents have not provided police protection. After issuing notice to the contemnors, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition.

2. The respondents filed a counter and a typed set of papers stating that on 10.12.2014, an order has been passed by the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, directing the Inspector of Police namely Sugumar, Checkkanurani Police Station, Madurai District, to give police protection to the petitioner and his family. The contemnor has also produced the General Diary which shows that one police constable has been deputed for protection to the petitioner and his family.

3. Considering the submissions of the respondent and also General Diary produced today, the contemnor has complied with the order passed by this Court and there is no wilfull disobedience of the order and there is no elements of contempt. Hence, the contempt petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial