K. Appasamy and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

K. Appasamy and Another vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 16, 2015

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1178786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1178786
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala
Decided On: Oct 16, 2015
Case Number: CRL.O.P.(MD)Nos. 11184 of 2014 & 14227 of 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K. Appasamy and Another

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 03.04.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. on 14.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 16.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. hence, the criminal original petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 03.04.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.)

1. On 14.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 16.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2015 Same Parties K. Appasamy and Another vs The Superintendent of Police, Madu... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Ms. Justice R. Mala