Omar Ali Vs. Abdul Ohab and Others

Omar Ali vs Abdul Ohab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Guwahati Decided Jan 08, 2014

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1172954

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1172954
Court: Guwahati High Court
Judge: The Honourable Chief Justice Mr. a.M. Sapre &Amp; Ujjal Bhuyan
Decided On: Jan 08, 2014
Case Number: Misc. Case No.2233 of 2013 In Sl. No.206399 WA with W.A. No.195 of 2013 & W.A. No.361 of 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Omar Ali

Advocate Mr. R. Dutta

Respondent

Abdul Ohab and Others

Excerpt

a.m. sapre, c.j. heard mr. i.h. saikia, learned counsel and mr. r. dutta, learned counsel for the appellants and mr. d. saikia, learned additional advocate general, assam. these are intra-court appeals filed by the petitioners no.2 and 4 of w.p.(c) no.6330 of 2011 in serial no.206399 wa; respondent no.4 of w.p.(c) no.5191 of 2011 in w.a. no.195/2013 and respondent no.5 of w.p.(c) no.4020 of 2011 in w.a. no.361/2013, under rule 2(3) of chapter va of the gauhati high court rules. learned counsels appearing for the applicants/ appellants are permitted to withdraw these appeals with a liberty to avail the benefit of the process initiated by the state by affording an opportunity of being heard to the affected teachers in terms of the directions given by the learned single judge in the impugned order. with the grant of this indulgence/liberty to the applicants/appellants, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn as prayed by the learned counsel for the appellants. no cost.

Full Judgment

A.M. Sapre, C.J.

Heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel and Mr. R. Dutta, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. D. Saikia, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam.

These are intra-court appeals filed by the petitioners No.2 and 4 of W.P.(C) No.6330 of 2011 in Serial No.206399 WA; Respondent No.4 of W.P.(C) No.5191 of 2011 in W.A. No.195/2013 and Respondent No.5 of W.P.(C) No.4020 of 2011 in W.A. No.361/2013, under Rule 2(3) of Chapter VA of the Gauhati High Court Rules.

Learned counsels appearing for the applicants/ appellants are permitted to withdraw these appeals with a liberty to avail the benefit of the process initiated by the State by affording an opportunity of being heard to the affected teachers in terms of the directions given by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order.

With the grant of this indulgence/liberty to the applicants/appellants, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn as prayed by the learned counsel for the appellants.

No cost.

Same Court & Year Guwahati · 2014 Same Parties Omar Ali vs Abdul Ohab and Others Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Chief Justice Mr. a.M. Sapre &Amp; Ujjal Bhuyan