Petition Vs. Respondent

Petition vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Guwahati Decided Mar 10, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1172842

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1172842
Court: Guwahati High Court
Judge: The Honourable Chief Justice Mr. a. M. Sapre &Amp; a. K. Goswami
Decided On: Mar 10, 2014
Case Number: PIL No.79 of 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petition

Advocate Mr. A. R. Sikdar

Respondent

Excerpt

a.m. sapre, cj. heard mr. a. r. sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners and mr. a. deka, learned standing counsel, education, appearing for the respondents. on entertaining this pil against the respondents in relation to certain irregularities said to have been committed into the affairs of golia sri rampur pre-senior madrassa, goraimari, the government got the enquiry conducted by additional deputy commissioner (ramendra nath sarma), barpeta. the enquiry officer by his report dated 17.12.2013 which is placed on record concluded as under:- âsri sk sinha, inspector, food, civil supplies and consumer affairs deptt, barpeta was entrusted to cause a detail enquiry into to the matter and a suspension proceeding has been drawn up, under the provision of the assam public distribution of articles order, 1982, against the fp shop dealer, the deputy director i/c, food, civil supplies and consumer affairs deptt, barpeta stated.â we have perused the enquiry report and find that as suggested in the enquiry report, a detailed enquiry is required to be undertaken into the affairs which is subject matter of this pil and the enquiry conducted by additional deputy commissioner dated 17.12.2013. we, accordingly, while disposing of this writ petition (pil) direct the concerned state authorities (respondents herein) to hold a detail enquiry, as directed in the enquiry report dated 17.12.2013, quoted above and after conclusion of the detail enquiry, action if required in the light of the finding of the enquiry report should be taken against all responsible in accordance with law. let the enquiry be initiated and completed within a period of three months from the date of this order and depending upon the outcome of the enquiry consequential action against all erring persons/officials etc. be initiated in accordance with law. a copy of this order be sent to all concerned and officials for ensuring compliance. no cost.

Full Judgment

A.M. Sapre, CJ.

Heard Mr. A. R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Education, appearing for the respondents.

On entertaining this PIL against the respondents in relation to certain irregularities said to have been committed into the affairs of Golia Sri Rampur Pre-senior Madrassa, Goraimari, the Government got the enquiry conducted by Additional Deputy Commissioner (Ramendra Nath Sarma), Barpeta. The enquiry officer by his report dated 17.12.2013 which is placed on record concluded as under:-

âSri SK Sinha, Inspector, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Deptt, Barpeta was entrusted to cause a detail enquiry into to the matter and a suspension proceeding has been drawn up, under the provision of the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order, 1982, against the FP Shop dealer, the Deputy Director i/c, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Deptt, Barpeta stated.â

We have perused the enquiry report and find that as suggested in the enquiry report, a detailed enquiry is required to be undertaken into the affairs which is subject matter of this PIL and the enquiry conducted by Additional Deputy Commissioner dated 17.12.2013.

We, accordingly, while disposing of this writ petition (PIL) direct the concerned State authorities (respondents herein) to hold a detail enquiry, as directed in the enquiry report dated 17.12.2013, quoted above and after conclusion of the detail enquiry, action if required in the light of the finding of the enquiry report should be taken against all responsible in accordance with law.

Let the enquiry be initiated and completed within a period of three months from the date of this order and depending upon the outcome of the enquiry consequential action against all erring persons/officials etc. be initiated in accordance with law.

A copy of this order be sent to all concerned and officials for ensuring compliance. No cost.

Same Court & Year Guwahati · 2014 Same Parties Petition vs Respondent Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Chief Justice Mr. a. M. Sapre &Amp; a. K. Goswami