Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bal Bahadur Limbu and Others Vs. Ashbel Barloo

Bal Bahadur Limbu and Others vs Ashbel Barloo

Type Court Judgment Court Guwahati Decided Mar 18, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1172821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Guwahati High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP 465 of 2006
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bal Bahadur Limbu and Others

Respondent

Ashbel Barloo

Excerpt

heard ms. s borah, learned counsel for the petitioners. this is a revision petition filed by the plaintiff under article 226/227 of the constitution of india read with section 115 of the civil procedure code questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 5.10.2005 passed by the learned civil judge (sr. division) golaghat in a pending civil suit being t.s. no. 16/2002. by the impugned order, the learned civil judge dismissed the application made by the plaintiff in the said pending suit under order 16, rule 1(2) of the civil procedure code which was registered as petition no. 871/05. at this stage, i am not inclined to apply my mind to the merits and de-merits of the impugned order passed by the learned civil judge and grant liberty to the plaintiff to challenge the legality and correctness of this order, if occasion so arises, in a regularly constituted appeal under section 96 of the civil procedure code against the final judgment and decree that may be passed in the civil suit finally one way or the other. this occasion may or may not arise, but at this stage, i express no opinion either way. learned civil judge is directed to decide the civil suit which is pending since 2002 on day to day basis and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of parties appearance before the judge concerned. parties shall appear before the trial court on 7.4.2014 and produce a copy of this order to enable the learned trial judge to proceed in the matter and decide the suit finally strictly in accordance with law after affording opportunity of being heard to both the parties concerned. as a result, the stay order passed on 6.1.2006 is hereby vacated/ recalled to enable the trial judge to decide the suit as directed. the original records of the case be sent to the concerned trial court forthwith by the registry so as to reach the concerned trial court on or before 7.4.2014. no cost.

Full Judgment

Heard Ms. S Borah, learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is a revision petition filed by the plaintiff under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 5.10.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Golaghat in a pending civil suit being T.S. No. 16/2002.

By the impugned order, the learned Civil Judge dismissed the application made by the plaintiff in the said pending suit under Order 16, Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Code which was registered as Petition No. 871/05.

At this stage, I am not inclined to apply my mind to the merits and de-merits of the impugned order passed by the learned Civil Judge and grant liberty to the plaintiff to challenge the legality and correctness of this order, if occasion so arises, in a regularly constituted appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the final judgment and decree that may be passed in the civil suit finally one way or the other.

This occasion may or may not arise, but at this stage, I express no opinion either way.

Learned Civil Judge is directed to decide the civil suit which is pending since 2002 on day to day basis and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of parties appearance before the Judge concerned.

Parties shall appear before the Trial Court on 7.4.2014 and produce a copy of this order to enable the learned Trial Judge to proceed in the matter and decide the suit finally strictly in accordance with law after affording opportunity of being heard to both the parties concerned.

As a result, the stay order passed on 6.1.2006 is hereby vacated/ recalled to enable the Trial Judge to decide the suit as directed.

The original records of the case be sent to the concerned Trial Court forthwith by the Registry so as to reach the concerned Trial Court on or before 7.4.2014. No Cost.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial