State of U.P. Vs. Gamal Yadav

State of U.P. vs Gamal Yadav

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jul 08, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1170624

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1170624
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: H.L. Gokhale and Madan B. Lokur
Decided On: Jul 08, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of U.P.

Respondent

Gamal Yadav

Advocate Ms. Rachana Srivastava

Excerpt

in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.5351 of2013(arising out of slp(c) no.30940/2012) state of u.p. appellant(s) :versus: gamal yadav respondent(s) order leave granted.2. heard mr. vikrant yadav, learned counsel in support of this appeal and ms. rachana srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.3. the respondent was working in the establishment of the appellant for about 20 years and on being discontinued, he approached the labour court. the labour court passed an award in his favour by directing reinstatement with 50% back-wages. the appellant challenged the award of the labour court before the high court and the high court left the award undisturbed. the appellant has, therefore, filed this appeal by special leave.-.2- 4. counsel for the appellant submits that the activity in the establishment of the appellant related to taking out silk from silk worms and it is not an 'industry'. this court has granted stay of the impugned order. the respondent is ready for an appropriate settlement on monetary aspect. the parties leave to the court to pass appropriate order.5. in our view, the impugned order of award can be modified by granting 25% back-wages. we accordingly modify the orders passed by the labour court as also the high court and direct that the respondent shall be reinstated in service with continuity of service and 25% back-wages. however, the question of law raised in this appeal shall remain open. the appeal is disposed of accordingly. .........................j (h.l. gokhale) ...........................j (madan b. lokur) new delhi; july 8, 2013.

Full Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5351 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30940/2012) STATE OF U.P. Appellant(s) :VERSUS: GAMAL YADAV Respondent(s) ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Heard Mr. Vikrant Yadav, learned counsel in support of this appeal and Ms. Rachana Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. The respondent was working in the establishment of the appellant for about 20 years and on being discontinued, he approached the Labour Court. The Labour Court passed an award in his favour by directing reinstatement with 50% back-wages. The appellant challenged the award of the Labour Court before the High Court and the High Court left the award undisturbed. The appellant has, therefore, filed this appeal by special leave.-.2- 4. Counsel for the appellant submits that the activity in the establishment of the appellant related to taking out silk from silk worms and it is not an 'industry'. This Court has granted stay of the impugned order. The respondent is ready for an appropriate settlement on monetary aspect. The parties leave to the Court to pass appropriate order.

5. In our view, the impugned order of award can be modified by granting 25% back-wages. We accordingly modify the orders passed by the Labour Court as also the High Court and direct that the respondent shall be reinstated in service with continuity of service and 25% back-wages. However, the question of law raised in this appeal shall remain open. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. .........................J (H.L. GOKHALE) ...........................J (MADAN B. LOKUR) New Delhi; July 8, 2013.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2013 Same Parties State of U.P. vs Gamal Yadav Same Subject Education Same Judge H.L. Gokhale and Madan B. Lokur