Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Chandra Vs. K.Jagadeeswari

P.Chandra vs K.Jagadeeswari

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 17, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1167573

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Chandra

Respondent

K.Jagadeeswari

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madras dated :- 17.06.2013 coram the hon'ble mr.justice k.ravichandrabaabu c.r.p.(npd) no.2957 of 2012 and m.p.no.1 of 2012 p.chandra ..petitioner vs k.jagadeeswari ..respondent civil revision petition filed against the order and decreetal order dated 15.6.2012 made in r.c.a no.368 of 2010 on the file of the viii judge, small causes court, chennai against the order and decreetal order dated 29.4.2010 made in r.c.o.p.no.1285 of 2008 on the file of the xi judge, small causes court, chennai. for petitioner :- mrs.al.gandhimathi for respondents :- mr.k.s.raman order it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already vacated and handed over vacant possession of the property to the respondent/landlady. the said fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent k.ravichandrabaabu,j. krr/ /landlady. learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect. considering the said fact, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. consequently, the connected m.p is closed. no costs. 17.06.2013 index:yes/no internet yes/no krr/ to the registrar small causes court chennai. c.r.p.(npd) no.2957 of 2012

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 17.06.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2957 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 P.Chandra ..Petitioner Vs K.Jagadeeswari ..Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed against the order and decreetal order dated 15.6.2012 made in R.C.A No.368 of 2010 on the file of the VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai against the order and decreetal order dated 29.4.2010 made in R.C.O.P.No.1285 of 2008 on the file of the XI Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner :- Mrs.AL.Gandhimathi For Respondents :- Mr.K.S.Raman ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already vacated and handed over vacant possession of the property to the respondent/landlady.

The said fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.

Krr/ /landlady.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect.

Considering the said fact, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, the connected M.P is closed.

No costs.

17.06.2013 Index:Yes/No Internet Yes/No krr/ To The Registrar Small Causes Court Chennai.

C.R.P.(NPD) No.2957 of 2012

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial