Poly Bag Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Poly Bag vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Aug 11, 1997

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/11675

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/11675
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: Aug 11, 1997
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Poly Bag

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In: (1997)(94)ELT669TriDel

Excerpt

1. the dispute is in respect of classification of hdpe/pp, tape, fabrics and woven sacks. the items were classified under chapter heading nos. 54 and 63 of the central excise tariff act, 1985. however, it is brought to our notice since the madhya pradesh has given a verdict that these items have been classifiable under chapter 39 of the get in the case of rajpack well ltd. v. union of india, reported in 1990 (50) e.l.t. 201 (m.p.), the tribunal has been consistently remanding the matter for reconsideration. in view of the rajpack well ltd. v. union of india and following the consistency of the tribunal, the matter is remanded to the concerned jurisdictional assistant collector to decide the issue afresh in the light of the decision referred to above and claim of the party may be considered with reference to any other notification if it is permissible. appeal is allowed by way of remand.

Full Judgment

1. The dispute is in respect of classification of HDPE/PP, Tape, Fabrics and Woven Sacks. The Items were classified under Chapter Heading Nos. 54 and 63 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. However, it is brought to our notice since the Madhya Pradesh has given a verdict that these items have been classifiable under Chapter 39 of the GET in the case of Rajpack Well Ltd. v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (50) E.L.T. 201 (M.P.), the Tribunal has been consistently remanding the matter for reconsideration. In view of the Rajpack Well Ltd. v. Union of India and following the consistency of the Tribunal, the matter is remanded to the concerned jurisdictional Assistant Collector to decide the issue afresh in the light of the decision referred to above and claim of the party may be considered with reference to any other notification if it is permissible. Appeal is allowed by way of remand.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Poly Bag vs Commissioner of Central Excise Same Subject Land Acquisition