Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moorthi Vs. State

Moorthi vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided May 16, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1167245

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moorthi

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 28.5.2013. 2.according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent/police has not passed any orders based on his representation, dated 13.05.2013. 3.in view of the fact that no orders have been passed by the respondent/police based on the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2013, the petitioner has been perforced to project the present writ petition before this court seeking for issuance of an order in directing the respondent in granting permission to conduct a cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, in palpattarai arulmighu marriamman temple, situated at ganesapuram, namakkal district. 4.this court has heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondent and also looked into the relevant typed set of papers filed before this court in this writ petition. 5.on a careful consideration of respective contentions, this court is inclined to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2013 in regard to the conduct of the cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, as made mention of in his representation and to pass appropriate orders in according permission to the petitioner to conduct the cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, at palpattarai arulmighu marriamman temple, ganesapuram, namakkal district, between 7.00 p.m.and 10.00 p.m., subject to the following conditions:- (a)the cultural programme should be conducted by the petitioner in an organised and serene manner without causing any law and order problem. (b)the petitioner is directed to file an affidavit before the respondent/police that there will not be any obscene or vulgar dance during the performance by any one of the prospective participants or others.as the case may be. (c)the dance programme is restricted between 7.00 p.m.and 10.00 p.m.on 28.05.2013. 6.if the petitioner violates any one.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.05.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.14361 of 2013 Moorthi .Petitioner Vs The State, rep., by The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal District.Respondent Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide permission to conduct Village Folk and Cinema dance and other cultrual programs on 28.5.2013, at Palpattarai Arulmighu Marriamman Temple, Ganesapuram, Namakkal District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader ORDER

The Petitioner sent a representation, dated 13.05.2013, to the respondent/Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal District, for conducting cultural programmes like village dance, which is scheduled to be held on 28.5.2013.

2.According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Respondent/Police has not passed any orders based on his representation, dated 13.05.2013.

3.In view of the fact that no orders have been passed by the Respondent/Police based on the representation of the Petitioner dated 13.05.2013, the Petitioner has been perforced to project the present Writ Petition before this Court seeking for issuance of an order in directing the Respondent in granting permission to conduct a cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, in Palpattarai Arulmighu Marriamman Temple, situated at Ganesapuram, Namakkal District.

4.This Court has heard the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondent and also looked into the relevant typed set of papers filed before this Court in this Writ Petition.

5.On a careful consideration of respective contentions, this Court is inclined to direct the Respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 13.05.2013 in regard to the conduct of the cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, as made mention of in his representation and to pass appropriate orders in according permission to the Petitioner to conduct the cultural programme to be held on 28.05.2013, at Palpattarai Arulmighu Marriamman Temple, Ganesapuram, Namakkal District, between 7.00 p.m.and 10.00 p.m., subject to the following conditions:- (a)The cultural programme should be conducted by the Petitioner in an organised and serene manner without causing any law and order problem.

(b)The Petitioner is directed to file an affidavit before the Respondent/Police that there will not be any obscene or vulgar dance during the performance by any one of the prospective participants or otheRs.as the case may be.

(c)The dance programme is restricted between 7.00 p.m.and 10.00 p.m.on 28.05.2013.

6.If the Petitioner violates any one of the aforesaid conditions, the Respondent/Police or the duly Authorised Officer on his behalf is empowered to take necessary action in accordance with law and in the manner known to law (including the one under the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 (60 of 1986) and put an end to such performance.

If the programme exceeds the permitted time limit, viz., 10.00 p.m.on 28.05.2013, then the Respondent/Police is directed to immediately stop the cultural/dance/drama programme.

7.With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

No costs.

Bs/versus To The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal District

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial