Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt. Mita De and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Smt. Mita De and anr. vs The State of West Bengal and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Oct 22, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1166176

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Mita De and anr.

Respondent

The State of West Bengal and ors.

Excerpt

.....mr.prithu dudhoria, adv.mr.arindam mandal, adv.…state the court : mr.partha chakraborty, learned counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners.mr.prithu dudhoria, learned counsel appears on behalf of the state respondents. the petitioners submit that disputes have cropped up in respect of the subject premises located at 28a, brojo nath mitra lane, kolkata-700 009. he further submits that he apprehends threat of dispossession from the subject premises. learned counsel for the state submits that a proceeding under section 144(2) cr.p.c.being case no.744/2014 is pending in respect of the subject premises in the court of the learned 3rd executive & metropolitan magistrate, calcutta. he refers to the report of the police authority in respect of the said subject premises and such report has been submitted before the learned magistrate. the report produced before this court today be kept with the records. in the above premises, this court is satisfied that steps have been taken before the court of the competent learned magistrate in accordance with law in connection with the disputes between the parties arising out of the subject premises. this court is further satisfied that this matter be heard on affidavits. accordingly, let affidavit-in-opposition be filed within two weeks upon the reopening of the court after the long annual vacation of the year 2014. affidavit-in-reply be filed within a week thereafter. let the matter appear before the regular bench on completion of the period granted for filing of affidavits as above. urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (subrata talukdar, j.) sg/dg2.

Full Judgment

T.

No.305 of 2014 WP No.985 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SMT.

MITA DE & ANR.

Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUBRATA TALUKDAR Date : 22nd October, 2014.

Appearance Mr.Partha Chakraborty, Adv.Mr.Jayanta Mukherjee, Adv.…Petitioners Mr.Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.Mr.Arindam Mandal, Adv.…State The Court : Mr.Partha Chakraborty, learned Counsel appears on behalf of the petitioneRs.Mr.Prithu Dudhoria, learned Counsel appears on behalf of the State respondents.

The petitioners submit that disputes have cropped up in respect of the subject premises located at 28A, Brojo Nath Mitra Lane, Kolkata-700 009.

He further submits that he apprehends threat of dispossession from the subject premises.

Learned Counsel for the State submits that a proceeding under Section 144(2) Cr.P.C.being Case No.744/2014 is pending in respect of the subject premises in the Court of the learned 3rd Executive & Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta.

He refers to the report of the police authority in respect of the said subject premises and such report has been submitted before the learned Magistrate.

The report produced before this Court today be kept with the records.

In the above premises, this Court is satisfied that steps have been taken before the court of the competent learned Magistrate in accordance with law in connection with the disputes between the parties arising out of the subject premises.

This Court is further satisfied that this matter be heard on affidavits.

Accordingly, let affidavit-in-opposition be filed within two weeks upon the reopening of the Court after the long annual vacation of the year 2014.

Affidavit-in-reply be filed within a week thereafter.

Let the matter appear before the regular Bench on completion of the period granted for filing of affidavits as above.

Urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(SUBRATA TALUKDAR, J.) sg/dg2.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial