Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Sep 24, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1164816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1164816
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: Arijit Banerjee
Decided On: Sep 24, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Excerpt

.....kaur, advocate for defendant no.7 for defendant no.4 : mr.mr.ms.mr.: mr.mr.debnath ghosh, advocate soumya roychowdhury, advocate soma rahman, advocate sarosij dasgupta, advocate abhrajit mitra, sr.advocate satadip bhattacharya, advocate the court : by an order dated 29th august, 2014 liberty was given to the plaintiff to file a supplementary affidavit within a fortnight from that date. the plaintiff was also directed to serve a copy of such affidavit on the parties including the added defendant no.7. today mr.roychowdhury, learnes counsel for the added defendant no.7 submits that copy of such supplementary affidavit was served on the learned advocate on record of the added defendant no.7 only a couple of days ago and that too after a letter was written to the plaintiff’s learned advocate on record seeking a copy of the supplementary affidavit. he submits that this is just a ploy on the part of the plaintiff to delay the proceeding as there was a clear direction in the order dated 29th august, 2014 for service of a copy of the supplementary affidavit on the parties including the added defendant no.7. mr.roychowdhury prays for time till one week after the puja vacation plaintiff’s affidavit. to file his interlocutory client’s application such time is granted. affidavit as well in as opposition the to the supplementary the plaintiff will be at liberty to file affidavit in reply within a fortnight thereafter. mr.mitra, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant no.4 seeks for extension of time to file affidavit in reply dealing with the plaintiff’s supplementary affidavit. let such affidavit in reply be filed by the defendant no.4 within one week after the puja vacation. the plaintiff will be at liberty to file affidavit in reply to the affidavit in opposition filed on behalf of the defendant no.4 within two weeks after the puja vacation. let the matter stand adjourned till three weeks after the puja vacation. (arijit banerjee, j.) msen

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET GA No.1741 of 2013 With CS No.202 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ASHA AUDIO COMPANY AND PVT.LTD.SAGARIKA MUSIC Plaintiff/Petitioner Versus OM PRAKASH SONIK & ORS.Defendant/Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 24th September, 2014.

For Plaintiff/Petitioner : Mr.S.S.

Banerjee, Advocate Ms.Bitika Kaur, Advocate For Defendant No.7 For Defendant No.4 : Mr.Mr.Ms.Mr.: Mr.Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Advocate Soumya Roychowdhury, Advocate Soma Rahman, Advocate Sarosij Dasgupta, Advocate Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Advocate Satadip Bhattacharya, Advocate The Court : By an order dated 29th August, 2014 liberty was given to the plaintiff to file a supplementary affidavit within a fortnight from that date.

The plaintiff was also directed to serve a copy of such affidavit on the parties including the added defendant No.7.

Today Mr.Roychowdhury, learnes counsel for the added defendant No.7 submits that copy of such supplementary affidavit was served on the learned Advocate on record of the added defendant No.7 only a couple of days ago and that too after a letter was written to the plaintiff’s learned Advocate on record seeking a copy of the supplementary affidavit.

He submits that this is just a ploy on the part of the plaintiff to delay the proceeding as there was a clear direction in the order dated 29th August, 2014 for service of a copy of the supplementary affidavit on the parties including the added defendant No.7.

Mr.Roychowdhury prays for time till one week after the puja vacation plaintiff’s affidavit.

to file his interlocutory client’s application Such time is granted.

affidavit as well in as opposition the to the supplementary The plaintiff will be at liberty to file affidavit in reply within a fortnight thereafter.

Mr.Mitra, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant No.4 seeks for extension of time to file affidavit in reply dealing with the plaintiff’s supplementary affidavit.

Let such affidavit in reply be filed by the defendant No.4 within one week after the puja vacation.

The plaintiff will be at liberty to file affidavit in reply to the affidavit in opposition filed on behalf of the defendant No.4 within two weeks after the puja vacation.

Let the matter stand adjourned till three weeks after the puja vacation.

(ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.) msen

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2014 Same Parties Appellant vs Respondent Same Subject Education Same Judge Arijit Banerjee