Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Sep 18, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1164435

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

order sheet cp no.705 of 2014 in the high court at calcutta original jurisdiction original side in the matter of : m/s.r.b.hor5ticulture & animal projects ltd.and in the matter of : sachindra nath manda before: the hon'ble justice biswanath somadder date : 18th september, 2014. appearance : mr.arun kumar das, adv.…for the petitioner the court: let affidavit of service filed in court today be taken on record. in spite of service, the company remains unrepresented even at the time of second call. the petitioner’s claim is on account of fixed deposit receipts issued by the respondent company for a total amount of rs.1,10,000/-. those fixed deposit receipts have matured on various dates between july, 2012 and january, 2014. the statutory notice dated 25th may, 2014 was not replied to by the company. as such, there is a presumption of the company’s inability to pay its debts. in such circumstances, the company is liable to be wound up. accordingly, the petition is admitted for a sum of rs.1,10,000/- together with the agreed rate of interest to be calculated from the date of statutory notice till the date of actual payment. if the company pays the aforesaid sum together with interest within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order, this winding up petition shall remain permanently stayed. in default, the petition will be advertised once in “the statesman” and once in “bartaman”. the advertisement should indicate that the matter will appear before the court on the firs.available working date when this court taken up company matters after the expiry of a period of four weeks from the date of publications being made. the publication in the official gazette will stand dispensed with. urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to the compliance with all requisite formalities. (biswanath somadder, j.) akb/

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET CP No.705 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : M/S.R.B.HOR5TICULTURE & ANIMAL PROJECTS LTD.AND IN THE MATTER OF : SACHINDRA NATH MANDA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 18th September, 2014.

Appearance : Mr.Arun Kumar Das, Adv.…for the petitioner The Court: Let affidavit of service filed in Court today be taken on record.

In spite of service, the company remains unrepresented even at the time of second call.

The petitioner’s claim is on account of fixed deposit receipts issued by the respondent company for a total amount of Rs.1,10,000/-.

Those fixed deposit receipts have matured on various dates between July, 2012 and January, 2014.

The statutory notice dated 25th May, 2014 was not replied to by the company.

As such, there is a presumption of the company’s inability to pay its debts.

In such circumstances, the company is liable to be wound up.

Accordingly, the petition is admitted for a sum of Rs.1,10,000/- together with the agreed rate of interest to be calculated from the date of statutory notice till the date of actual payment.

If the company pays the aforesaid sum together with interest within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order, this winding up petition shall remain permanently stayed.

In default, the petition will be advertised once in “The Statesman” and once in “Bartaman”.

The advertisement should indicate that the matter will appear before the Court on the fiRs.available working date when this Court taken up Company Matters after the expiry of a period of four weeks from the date of publications being made.

The publication in the Official Gazette will stand dispensed with.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to the compliance with all requisite formalities.

(BISWANATH SOMADDER, J.) akb/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial