Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State and anr

Smt. Champa Devi vs State and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Sep 08, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1164092

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Champa Devi

Respondent

State and anr

Excerpt

.....2/4 a. by an appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to give the joining as per rules with all benefits. b.. any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs.”. 5. the matter pertains to the claim of the petitioner about joining of the petitioner as safai karamchari in the selection process initiated by the respondent - municipal council, pali. it appears that the matter has already been ordered to be inquired about vide communication dated 29.05.2014 (see para 15 of the paper-book). the relevant portion of the same is quoted herein below for ready reference:- “र जस न सरक र स यत श सन व भ ग र ज. जयपर । (ज -3, र जमहल पलस रजजडज शयल एररय , ससव ल ल ईन फ टक, 22 ग#द म जयपर - 302013) (टल%फकस-0141-2222403 ए ई-मल-dlbrajasthan].gmail.com ब स ईट www.lsgraj.org) कम )क:- प. 1 ग( ) क /एसएमई/स.कम*./ड एलब /13/4732 ददन )क 29/5/14 आयक, नगर पररषद, प ल% । s.b. civil writ petition no.6216/2014. smt. champa devi vs. state & anr. final order dated 08.09.2014 3/4 व षय:- नगर पररषद प ल% म/ सफ ई कम*च ररय1 क2 भर4 पकरण क2 ज )च करन ब बर 7 । पस)ग:- व भ ग य पत )क 6304-7 ददन )क 16.1.14 ए ) 4691 ददन )क 14.2.14 क स)दभ* म/ । र जय सरक र द र नगर पररषद प ल% म/ 283 सफ ई कम*च ररय1 क2 भर4 हर ददन )क 03.05.13 क# ननद< श ज र% ककय गय । जजनम/ स नगर पररषद प ल% द र स क>नर क.....

Full Judgment

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6216/2014. Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State & Anr. Final Order dated 08.09.2014 1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER

:: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6216/2014. Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State & Anr. .. Date of Order ::::

8. h September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: None present for the petitioner. -- BY THE COURT:

1. The lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions. Name of Mr. Prem Dayal Bohra, as the counsel for the petitioner, is shown in the cause list.

2. Nobody is present for the petitioner.

3. Perused the record. The case is listed at Sl. No.5 in the cause list under the category of “For Fresh Admission Without Stay”..

4. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in this Court on 29.08.2014 with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioners may kindly be allowed:- S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6216/2014. Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State & Anr. Final Order dated 08.09.2014 2/4 A. By an appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to give the joining as per rules with all benefits. B.. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs.”. 5. The matter pertains to the claim of the petitioner about joining of the petitioner as Safai Karamchari in the selection process initiated by the respondent - Municipal Council, Pali. It appears that the matter has already been ordered to be inquired about vide communication dated 29.05.2014 (see para 15 of the paper-book). The relevant portion of the same is quoted herein below for ready reference:- “र जस न सरक र स यत श सन व भ ग र ज. जयपर । (ज -3, र जमहल पलस रजजडज शयल एररय , ससव ल ल ईन फ टक, 22 ग#द म जयपर - 302013) (टल%फकस-0141-2222403 ए ई-मल-dlbrajasthan].gmail.com ब स ईट www.lsgraj.org) कम )क:- प. 1 ग( ) क /एसएमई/स.कम*./ड एलब /13/4732 ददन )क 29/5/14 आयक, नगर पररषद, प ल% । S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6216/2014. Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State & Anr. Final Order dated 08.09.2014 3/4 व षय:- नगर पररषद प ल% म/ सफ ई कम*च ररय1 क2 भर4 पकरण क2 ज )च करन ब बर 7 । पस)ग:- व भ ग य पत )क 6304-7 ददन )क 16.1.14 ए ) 4691 ददन )क 14.2.14 क स)दभ* म/ । र जय सरक र द र नगर पररषद प ल% म/ 283 सफ ई कम*च ररय1 क2 भर4 हर ददन )क 03.05.13 क# ननद< श ज र% ककय गय । जजनम/ स नगर पररषद प ल% द र स क>नर क कम म/ 283 सफ ई अभयर य * 1 क चयन ददन )क 17.12.2013 क# ककय गय । जजसक व रद सशक यर प प ह#न पर ज )च कर ई गई । जजनम/ स उप ननदशक (कत य) स न य ननक य व भ ग, ज#धपर द र कल 157 अभयर य * 1 क2 ननयकक नगर पररषद प ल% द र पI * म/ द% ज चक2 ह । ज# ज )च ररप#ट* म/ श समल ह । अर: ननद< श नस र ननद< सशर ककय ज र ह कक नगर पररषद द र चयननर 115 अभयर य * 1 क2 उप ननदशक (कत य) स न य ननक य व भ ग ज#धपर क2 ज )च ररप#ट* क आध र पर र जय सरक र द र ज र% ननद< श नस र सफ ई कम*च ररय1 क2 भर4 हर गदJर चयन ससमनर द र अपन सरर पर ननयम नस र ज )च कर ननयकक क2 क य* ह% कर / र ज# 14 अभय 4 पI * म/ ननयक ककय ज चक ह उनक2 प तर क2 भ उक ससमनर ज )च कर क य* ह% कर / । sd/- ( स .एस.बन ल ) नन द श क" S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6216/2014. Smt. Champa Devi Vs. State & Anr. Final Order dated 08.09.2014 4/4 6. In view of the pendency of the inquiry in the matter regarding eligibility of the candidates to the post of Safai Karamchari, as afore-quoted, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is considered premature and, therefore, this writ petition is liable to be disposed of. However, the petitioner will be free to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law once the pending inquiry in the matter is completed by the Government Authorities and appropriate report is furnished to the State Government.

7. Accordingly and in view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

/Mohan/ / 5 /

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial