Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Nemi Chand Solanki Vs. State and ors

Nemi Chand Solanki vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Aug 29, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1163635

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nemi Chand Solanki

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

.....is contrary to various supreme court decisions.2. heard the petitioner, who is present in person.3. the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner being sbcwp no.5991/2014- nemi chand solanki vs. state & ors., has already been disposed of three days back on 26.08.2014, wherein it was directed as under: - “accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction and liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation ventilating all his s.b. civil writ petition no.6085/2014. nemi chand solanki vs. state of rajasthan & ors. order dated 29/08/2014 2/2 grievances against the impugned order annexure- 5 dated 11.08.2014 within a period of fifteen days from today and the said respondent i.e. director of secondary education, bikaner is expected to consider the case of the petitioner and decide the representation within one month thereafter in accordance with law, preferably after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.”. 4. the petitioner has not given any representation in pursuance of the said order to the director of secondary education, bikaner, and without approaching the said authority, the petitioner has again filed the present writ petition purportedly on the ground that he has been relieved without deciding his representation.5. if the representation itself was not filed, the petitioner cannot blame the respondents for the same. the petitioner himself has not complied with the directions given by this court on 26.08.2014, the present writ petition is considered to be misconceived.6. the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. no costs. a copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (dr. vineet kothari), j.dj/- s-13

Full Judgment

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6085/2014. Nemi Chand Solanki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/08/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER

:: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6085/2014. Nemi Chand Solanki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::

29. h August, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Nemi Chand Solanki, petitioner present-in-person. -- BY THE COURT:

1. The lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions.

2. Heard the petitioner, who is present in person.

3. The earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner being SBCWP No.5991/2014- Nemi Chand Solanki Vs. State & Ors., has already been disposed of three days back on 26.08.2014, wherein it was directed as under: - “Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction and liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation ventilating all his S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6085/2014. Nemi Chand Solanki Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/08/2014 2/2 grievances against the impugned order Annexure- 5 dated 11.08.2014 within a period of fifteen days from today and the said respondent i.e. Director of Secondary Education, Bikaner is expected to consider the case of the petitioner and decide the representation within one month thereafter in accordance with law, preferably after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.”. 4. The petitioner has not given any representation in pursuance of the said order to the Director of Secondary Education, Bikaner, and without approaching the said authority, the petitioner has again filed the present writ petition purportedly on the ground that he has been relieved without deciding his representation.

5. If the representation itself was not filed, the petitioner cannot blame the respondents for the same. The petitioner himself has not complied with the directions given by this Court on 26.08.2014, the present writ petition is considered to be misconceived.

6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/- S-13

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2014 Same Parties Nemi Chand Solanki vs State and ors Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales