Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

ishwar Devi Grover and ors. Vs. State

ishwar Devi Grover and ors. vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 23, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1161720

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ishwar Devi Grover and ors.

Advocate Mr. Sandeep P. Agarwal, Mr. Rajesh Pathak

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. Jayendra

Excerpt

$~38 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi + test.cas. 83/2013 ishwar devi grover & ors ..... petitioners through: mr. sandeep p. agarwal and mr. rajesh pathak, advocates versus state ..... respondent through: mr. jayendra, advocate % coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher order2307.2014 1. by this petition, probate is sought of will dated 04.03.2013 (ex. pw1/1). the petitioners comprise of the wife and two sons, a daughter and grandson of the testator, one sh. bhagwan dass grover. the wife is arrayed as petitioner no.1. the two sons are arrayed as petitioner nos.2 and 3, while the daughter and the grandson are impleaded as petitioner nos.4 and 5 respectively.2. the said will (ex. pw1/1) bears the signatures of one dr. rajiv dingra (pw-1). pw-1 who has testified that the testator executed the document, pw1/1 dated 04.03.2013 in his presence and the presence of the other attesting witness, that is, smt. ishwar devi grover, i.e., petitioner no.1. pw-1 has further deposed that the testator signed the document pw1/1 in his presence and in the presence of petitioner no.1. test.cas. 83/2013 page 1 of 2 2.1 it is also stated by pw-1 that the testator at the stage of execution of the document pw1/1 was in a good and sound disposing state of mind.3. therefore, having regard to the fact that there is no objection on record to the grant of probate, and given the testimony of pw-1, i am inclined to grant probate, as prayed for by the petitioners as the execution of will (ex. pw1/1) has been proved in accordance with law.4. accordingly, will dated 04.03.2013 (pw1/1) will stand probated. the valuation report, i am told, is already on record. the registry will do the needful including calculate and recover, if necessary, the requisite court fee. decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.5. the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. rajiv shakdher, j july23 2014 yg test.cas. 83/2013 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TEST.CAS. 83/2013 ISHWAR DEVI GROVER & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep P. Agarwal and Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayendra, Advocate % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER

2307.2014 1. By this petition, probate is sought of WILL dated 04.03.2013 (Ex. PW1/1). The petitioners comprise of the wife and two sons, a daughter and grandson of the Testator, one Sh. Bhagwan Dass Grover. The wife is arrayed as petitioner no.1. The two sons are arrayed as petitioner nos.2 and 3, while the daughter and the grandson are impleaded as petitioner nos.4 and 5 respectively.

2. The said WILL (Ex. PW1/1) bears the signatures of one Dr. Rajiv Dingra (PW-1). PW-1 who has testified that the testator executed the document, PW1/1 dated 04.03.2013 in his presence and the presence of the other attesting witness, that is, Smt. Ishwar Devi Grover, i.e., petitioner no.1. PW-1 has further deposed that the testator signed the document PW1/1 in his presence and in the presence of petitioner no.1. TEST.CAS. 83/2013 page 1 of 2 2.1 It is also stated by PW-1 that the testator at the stage of execution of the document PW1/1 was in a good and sound disposing state of mind.

3. Therefore, having regard to the fact that there is no objection on record to the grant of probate, and given the testimony of PW-1, I am inclined to grant probate, as prayed for by the petitioners as the execution of WILL (Ex. PW1/1) has been proved in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, WILL dated 04.03.2013 (PW1/1) will stand probated. The valuation report, I am told, is already on record. The Registry will do the needful including calculate and recover, if necessary, the requisite court fee. Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly.

5. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JULY23 2014 yg TEST.CAS. 83/2013 page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial