Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Date of Decision:7.8.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Date of Decision:7.8.2014 vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 07, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1161077

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Date of Decision:7.8.2014

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

cwp no.15390 of 1994 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.15390 of 1994 date of decision:7.8.2014 surjit s. saluja ….petitioner versus state of punjab and others .....respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice hemant gupta hon’ble mr.justice kuldip singh present: mr.j.p.rana, advocate for the petitioner. mr.p.s.bajwa, additional advocate general, punjab for respondent no.1. mr.gurpreet singh, advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. **** hemant gupta, j.(oral) the petitioner has claimed a writ of mandamus claiming allotment of plot measuring 500 sq. yds being successful in the draw of lots of the plots in response to the advertisement published on 13.11.1983. a plot no.3154, sector 69, mohali came to be allotted to the petitioner. but the petitioner refused to accept the offer at the rate of rs.1200/- sq. yrd. offered to him and claimed that the plot be offered to him for allotment at the same rate on which the plots were allotted to some other applicants at the rate of rs.170/- per sq. yrd. today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is ready and willing to accept the offer of the respondents of allotment of a plot at such rate as is applicable today. on the other hand, mr.gurpreet singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.2 and 3 states that since the plot was earmarked for the petitioner, the same can be allotted to him at the gulati diwaker201408.13 09:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.15390 of 1994 2 rate of rs.38,500/- per sq. yrd., the current rate for the allotment of similar plots. learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to accept the allotment at the rate of rs.38,500/- per sq. yrd., the rate prevailing today. in view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to allot a plot no.3154, sector 69, mohali, at the rate of rs.38,500/- per sq. yrd. to the petitioner on all usual conditions. the needful be done within a period of two mont

Full Judgment

CWP No.15390 of 1994 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15390 of 1994 Date of decision:7.8.2014 Surjit S.

Saluja ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present: Mr.J.P.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

**** HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral) The petitioner has claimed a writ of mandamus claiming allotment of plot measuring 500 sq.

yds being successful in the draw of lots of the plots in response to the advertisement published on 13.11.1983.

A plot No.3154, Sector 69, Mohali came to be allotted to the petitioner.

But the petitioner refused to accept the offer at the rate of Rs.1200/- sq.

yrd.

offered to him and claimed that the plot be offered to him for allotment at the same rate on which the plots were allotted to some other applicants at the rate of Rs.170/- per sq.

yrd.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is ready and willing to accept the offer of the respondents of allotment of a plot at such rate as is applicable today.

On the other hand, Mr.Gurpreet Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 states that since the plot was earmarked for the petitioner, the same can be allotted to him at the GULATI DIWAKER201408.13 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.15390 of 1994 2 rate of Rs.38,500/- per sq.

yrd., the current rate for the allotment of similar plots.

Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to accept the allotment at the rate of Rs.38,500/- per sq.

yrd., the rate prevailing today.

In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to allot a plot No.3154, Sector 69, Mohali, at the rate of Rs.38,500/- per sq.

yrd.

to the petitioner on all usual conditions.

The needful be done within a period of two months.

(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE AUGUST7 2014 (KULDIP SINGH) ‘D.

Gulati’ JUDGE GULATI DIWAKER201408.13 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial