Gurpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Gurpreet Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 05, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1160136

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1160136
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Aug 05, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gurpreet Singh and Others

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

.....this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure has been filed for quashing of fir no.312 dated 13.09.2013, registered under sections 323, 324, 336, 341, 427, 148 and 149 of the indian penal code (for short 'the ipc') and 25/27/54/59 of the arms act, 1959, registered at police station kotwali, district faridkot and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. heard. the parties, duly identified by their respective learned counsel, are present in the court. affidavit of complainant-respondent no.2, has also been filed in the court, which is taken on record. he admits the factum of compromise and the contents of the affidavit filed manoj kumar201408.07 09:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm no.m-39191 of 2013 2 by him. in view of the above and the law laid down by hon'ble the supreme court, in 'gian singh versus state of punjab and another', 2012(4) rcr (criminal) 543, this court feels that no purpose would be served in keeping the proceedings alive. accordingly, the present petition is allowed. fir no.312 dated 13.09.2013, registered under sections 323, 324, 336, 341, 427, 148 and 149 of the indian penal code (for short 'the ipc') and 25/27/54/59 of the arms act, 1959, registered at police station kotwali, district faridkot and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the present petitioner(s).august 05, 2014 (jitendra chauhan) manoj bhutani judge manoj kumar201408.07 09:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-39191 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-39191 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.08.2014.

Gurpreet Singh and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Amanpreet Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.

Mr.Mikhil Kad, AAG, Punjab assisted by Baldev Singh.

JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.

(Oral) This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of FIR No.312 dated 13.09.2013, registered under Sections 323, 324, 336, 341, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Faridkot and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

Heard.

The parties, duly identified by their respective learned counsel, are present in the Court.

Affidavit of complainant-respondent No.2, has also been filed in the Court, which is taken on record.

He admits the factum of compromise and the contents of the affidavit filed MANOJ KUMAR201408.07 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM No.M-39191 of 2013 2 by him.

In view of the above and the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, in 'Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and another', 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543, this Court feels that no purpose would be served in keeping the proceedings alive.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.

FIR No.312 dated 13.09.2013, registered under Sections 323, 324, 336, 341, 427, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Faridkot and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the present petitioner(s).August 05, 2014 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) Manoj Bhutani JUDGE MANOJ KUMAR201408.07 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Gurpreet Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Others Same Subject Education