Dev Raj and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Dev Raj and Others vs State of Punjab and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 05, 2014

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1160110

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1160110
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Aug 05, 2014
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dev Raj and Others

Respondent

State of Punjab and Another

Excerpt

.....crm no.m-13274 of2014(o&m) -2- k.c.puri, j. (oral) this order of mine shall dispose of two petitions bearing crm no.m-13274 of 2014 titled as, “dev raj and others versus state of punjab and another”. and crm no.m-13384 of 2014 titled as, “balbir singh and others versus state of punjab and another”., as the same have arisen out of the same occurrence. this is a petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing fir no.16 dated 17.01.2014 under sections 341/323/324/148/149 of the indian penal code, registered at police station maqsudan, district jalandhar city (annexure p-1).along with its cross version registered vide ddr no.34 dated 17.01.2014 under sections 324/148/149 of the indian penal code (annexure p-2).on the basis of compromise, along with all subsequent proceedings arising from that fir as well as its cross-version. reply filed. it be taken on record. report from the trial court has been received in which it is mentioned that statements of all the injured persons have been recorded. it is further mentioned that the parties have arrived at a compromise. it is a personal dispute which has been amicably settled between the parties. so, in view of the above circumstances and in view of authority reported as, “kulwinder singh and others versus state of punjab and others”. 2007 (3) rcr (criminal) 1052, the shalini bhatia201408.07 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm no.m-13274 of2014(o&m) -3- above said fir, along with its cross-version recorded vide ddr no.34 dated 17.01.2014, stand quashed. further proceedings in pursuant to that fir as well as its cross-version also stand quashed. disposed of. august05 2014 (k.c.puri) shalini judge shalini bhatia201408.07 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-13274 OF2014(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-13274 OF2014(O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.08.2014 Dev Raj and others ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents and CRM No.M-13384 OF2014O&M) Balbir Singh and others ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present : Mr.Ashok Giri Advocate, for the petitioners in CRM No.M-13274 of 2014.

Mr.Rahul Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Maninder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners in CRM No.M-13384 of 2014.

Mr.Yogesh Gupta, AAG, Punjab.

SHALINI BHATIA201408.07 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM No.M-13274 OF2014(O&M) -2- K.C.PURI, J.

(ORAL) This order of mine shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM No.M-13274 of 2014 titled as, “Dev Raj and others versus State of Punjab and another”.

and CRM No.M-13384 of 2014 titled as, “Balbir Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another”., as the same have arisen out of the same occurrence.

This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing FIR No.16 dated 17.01.2014 under Sections 341/323/324/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Maqsudan, District Jalandhar City (Annexure P-1).along with its cross version registered vide DDR No.34 dated 17.01.2014 under Sections 324/148/149 of the Indian Penal Code (Annexure P-2).on the basis of compromise, along with all subsequent proceedings arising from that FIR as well as its cross-version.

Reply filed.

It be taken on record.

Report from the trial Court has been received in which it is mentioned that statements of all the injured persons have been recorded.

It is further mentioned that the parties have arrived at a compromise.

It is a personal dispute which has been amicably settled between the parties.

So, in view of the above circumstances and in view of authority reported as, “Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others”.

2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the SHALINI BHATIA201408.07 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM No.M-13274 OF2014(O&M) -3- above said FIR, along with its cross-version recorded vide DDR No.34 dated 17.01.2014, stand quashed.

Further proceedings in pursuant to that FIR as well as its cross-version also stand quashed.

Disposed of.

AUGUST05 2014 (K.C.PURI) shalini JUDGE SHALINI BHATIA201408.07 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Dev Raj and Others vs State of Punjab and Another Same Subject Criminal