Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Thomas George Vs. Sasikumar

Thomas George vs Sasikumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 18, 2014
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1157605

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas George

Respondent

Sasikumar

Excerpt

.....the files of the munsiff's court, peermade. ext.p17: the true photostat copy of the order in i.a no.154/2014 in os no.68/2009 on the files of the munsiff's court, peermade. ext.p18: the true photostat copy of the order in i.a no.153/2014 in os no.68/2009 on the files of the munsiff's court, peermade. respondent(s)' exhibits : nil. ----------------------------- //true copy// p.s. to judge. v.chitambaresh, j.--------------------- o.p (c) nos.1269 & 1557 of 2014 --------------------- dated this the 18th day of july, 2014 judgment both sides are dissatisfied with the report and plan of the advocate commissioner filed in the suit. there is also no objection in directing the advocate commissioner to measure the property on the basis of the purchase certificate issued by the land tribunal. therefore exts.p11 and p13 orders impugned in o.p.(c) no.1557/2014 are set aside. this disposes of o.p.(c) no.1269/2014 filed challenging ext.p11 order aforesaid.2. consequently, i.a.nos.879/2012, 1279/2013, 153/2014 and 154/2014 in o.s.no.68/2009 stand allowed. the court of the munsiff of peermade shall direct the advocate commissioner to file a revised report soon. both the parties are at liberty to file work memo to the advocate commissioner independently. the advocate commissioner shall also avail the services of a taluk surveyor if necessary. the original petitions are disposed of. sd/- v.chitambaresh, judge. nj.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE18H DAY OF JULY201427TH ASHADHA, 1936 OP(C).No. 1269 of 2014 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER

IN OS682009 of MUNSIFF COURT, PEERUMEDU PETITIONER(S): ---------------- 1. THOMAS GEORGE, AGED55S/O.GEORGE THOMAS, KIZHAKETHIL HOUSE, MANNARAMALA KARA OMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOZHANCHERRY TALUK PIN CODE:

689. 647.

2. SHAJI GEORGE, AGED50S/O.GEORGE THOMAS, KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, MANNARMALA KARA OMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOZHANCHERRY TALUK, PIN :

689. 647.

3. JOJI GEORGE, AGED47YEARS S/O.GEORGE THOMAS, KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE MANNARAMALA KARA, OMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOZHANCHERRY TALUK PIN:

689. 647. BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR SRI.P.VISWANATHAN SRI. K.M.ALEXANDER SRI.GIKKU JACOB SRI.K.V.VINOD RESPONDENT(S): ---------------- 1. SASIKUMAR, S/O.AYAPPAN NARAYANAN, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE KUMILY KARA, KUMILY VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK PIN:

685. 509.

2. SHEELA,, AGED50YEARS D/O.AYYAPPAN NARAYANAN, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE KUMILY VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK, PIN:

685. 509. R1 BY ADV. MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.TERRY V.JAMES THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON1807-2014, ALONG WITH OP (C) NO.1557/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C).No. 1269 of 2014 (O) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.44/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P2: THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO.44/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P3: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P4: THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P5: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF I.A NO.930/2012 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P6 AND P6(A): THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT DATED0607/2013 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P7: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A NO.817/2013 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P8:THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A NO.879/2013 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P9:THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A NO.1279/2012 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P10: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE I.A NO.49/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P11: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.817/2013 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P12: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.879/2013 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P13: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.1279/2014 IN OS NO.1279/2014 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P14: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.49/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P15: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.154/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. OP(C) No.1269/2014 :

2. : EXT.P16: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.153/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P17: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.154/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. EXT.P18: THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER

IN I.A NO.153/2014 IN OS NO.68/2009 ON THE FILES OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PEERMADE. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL. ----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- O.P (C) Nos.1269 & 1557 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 18th day of July, 2014

JUDGMENT

Both sides are dissatisfied with the report and plan of the Advocate Commissioner filed in the suit. There is also no objection in directing the Advocate Commissioner to measure the property on the basis of the purchase certificate issued by the Land Tribunal. Therefore Exts.P11 and P13 orders impugned in O.P.(C) No.1557/2014 are set aside. This disposes of O.P.(C) No.1269/2014 filed challenging Ext.P11 order aforesaid.

2. Consequently, I.A.Nos.879/2012, 1279/2013, 153/2014 and 154/2014 in O.S.No.68/2009 stand allowed. The court of the Munsiff of Peermade shall direct the Advocate Commissioner to file a revised report soon. Both the parties are at liberty to file work memo to the Advocate Commissioner independently. The Advocate Commissioner shall also avail the services of a Taluk Surveyor if necessary. The Original Petitions are disposed of. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge. nj.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2014 Same Parties Thomas George vs Sasikumar Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales