Gls Esolution Private Limited Vs. Royd Enclave Owners’ Association and ors.

Gls Esolution Private Limited vs Royd Enclave Owners’ Association and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 17, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1156860

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1156860
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
Decided On: Jul 17, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gls Esolution Private Limited

Respondent

Royd Enclave Owners’ Association and ors.

Excerpt

.....matter upon notice to the respective parties. having heard learned advocate of the respective parties and also going through the impugned order under appeal, we are of the opinion that this application should be examined in further details. we are, however, prima facie of the opinion that the appellant/petitioner herein cannot be prevented from using the flat in question. the learned advocate representing the respondents/writ petitioners wants to take further instruction in this matter. the learned advocate representing the respondent/kolkata municipal corporation authorities also wants to take necessary instruction in the matter. considering the submissions of the learned advocate of the respondents, hearing of this matter stands adjourned till 21st july, 2014 when the matter will be listed under the heading ‘new application’. let there also be an interim order staying operation of the impugned order under appeal passed by the learned single judge till 24th july, 2014 or until further order whichever is earlier. all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. (pranab kumar chattopadhyay, j.) (samapti chatterjee, j.) akgoswami

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET GA No.2234 of 2014 APOT No.362 of 2014 WP No.582 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GLS e-Solution Private Limited Versus Royd Enclave Owners’ Association & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE Date: 17th July, 2014 Mr.Tanmoy Mukherjee, Adv.with Mr.Raghunath Das, Adv.Mr.Indradeep Basu, Adv..for the appellant Mr.Sanjib Kumar Mal, Adv.with Mr.Atanu Roy Choudhury, Adv..for the respondents 1 & 2 Mr.Ambar Nath Banerjee, Adv.with Mr.Debangshu Mondal, Adv..for the KMC This application has been filed in connection with the appeal preferred from the order dated 3rd July, 2014 whereby a learned Judge of this Court issued several directions in respect of the flat no.1 on the 2nd floor of premises at 8/B, Royd Street, Kolkata - 700 016.

In view of the extreme urgency involved in this matter, leave has been granted to the appellant/petitioner herein to move this application as unlisted matter upon notice to the respective parties.

Having heard learned Advocate of the respective parties and also going through the impugned order under appeal, we are of the opinion that this application should be examined in further details.

We are, however, prima facie of the opinion that the appellant/petitioner herein cannot be prevented from using the flat in question.

The learned Advocate representing the respondents/writ petitioners wants to take further instruction in this matter.

The learned Advocate representing the respondent/Kolkata Municipal Corporation authorities also wants to take necessary instruction in the matter.

Considering the submissions of the learned Advocate of the respondents, hearing of this matter stands adjourned till 21st July, 2014 when the matter will be listed under the heading ‘New Application’.

Let there also be an interim order staying operation of the impugned order under appeal passed by the learned Single Judge till 24th July, 2014 or until further order whichever is earlier.

All parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.) (SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE, J.) AKGoswami

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2014 Same Parties Gls Esolution Private Limited vs Royd Enclave Owners’ Assoc... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay