Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pappu Vs. Karthu

Pappu vs Karthu

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 10, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1156273

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pappu

Respondent

Karthu

Excerpt

.....dated215.2014 in ext.p2 petition. exhibit p10 : a true copy of ia.no.686/2014 in as.no.38/2014 on the file of the sub court, perumbavoor. exhibit p11 : certified copy of the order dated216.2014 in i.a.no.686/2014 in as.no.38/2014 on the file of the sub court, perumbavoor. exhibit p12 : a true copy of the judgment dated256.2014 in op(c) no.1421/2014. respondent(s) exhibits nil. //true copy// p.s. to judge. v.chitambaresh, j.--------------------- o.p (c) no.1563 of 2014 --------------------- dated this the 10th day of july, 2014 judgment an order refusing stay pending appeal filed against an order rejecting the claim petition is impugned. any pronouncement on merits will affect the ultimate disposal of the appeal suit causing prejudice to the parties. suffice it to say that a.s.no.38/2014 on the file of the court of the subordiante judge of perumbavoor shall be disposed of expeditiously. every endeavour shall be made to dispose of the appeal before the court closes for onam vacation.2. the petitioner, his wife and children can in the meanwhile be permitted to occupy the houses in the property as licensees. this is subject to the condition that the persons afore-mentioned files an affidavit in the appellate court undertaking to vacate the premises unconditionally dependent on the verdict in the appeal suit. it is made clear that no persons other than the petitioner, his wife and children are permitted to so occupy as licensees. such occupation as licensees will not confer any special right on the petitioner, his wife and children in the ultimate o.p (c) no.1563 of 2014 2 disposal of the appeal suit. the original petition is disposed of. sd/- v.chitambaresh, judge. nj.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE10H DAY OF JULY201419TH ASHADHA, 1936 OP(C).No. 1563 of 2014 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER

IN IA.NO.686/2014 IN AS382014 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED2106-2014 PETITIONER(S): ---------------- PAPPU,AGED86S/O.CHATHAN AND KUNJAMBA MORKKOOTTUKOOTTAM HOUSE, KALAPPARA ALATTUCHIRA PO, PIN CODE - 683 544 KODANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.ELDHO SRI.JIJO THOMAS SRI.SURAJ.S RESPONDENT(S): ------------------ KARTHU, AGED65 W/O.KANNAN MANEKKATTU HOUSE, KODANAD KARA KODANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 544. R BY SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON1007-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN O.P.(C) No.1563 OF 2014 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN AS.NO.38/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION VIDE EA.NO.30/2012 IN EP.NO.134/2010 IN OS.NO.15/1989 OF THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX REGISTER OF KODANAD VILLAGE PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPER REGISTER OF KODANAD VILLAGE WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH IN EXT.P2 CLAIM PETITION. EXHIBIT P6 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

IN O.A.NO.15/1989 OF THE MUNSIFF'S CDOSURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P7 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

IN W.P.(C) NO.4553/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P8 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

IN OP(C) NO.463/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P9 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

DATED215.2014 IN EXT.P2 PETITION. EXHIBIT P10 : A TRUE COPY OF IA.NO.686/2014 IN AS.NO.38/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P11 : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER

DATED216.2014 IN I.A.NO.686/2014 IN AS.NO.38/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR. EXHIBIT P12 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

DATED256.2014 IN OP(C) NO.1421/2014. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- O.P (C) No.1563 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2014

JUDGMENT

An order refusing stay pending appeal filed against an order rejecting the claim petition is impugned. Any pronouncement on merits will affect the ultimate disposal of the Appeal Suit causing prejudice to the parties. Suffice it to say that A.S.No.38/2014 on the file of the court of the Subordiante Judge of Perumbavoor shall be disposed of expeditiously. Every endeavour shall be made to dispose of the Appeal before the court closes for Onam vacation.

2. The petitioner, his wife and children can in the meanwhile be permitted to occupy the houses in the property as licensees. This is subject to the condition that the persons afore-mentioned files an affidavit in the Appellate Court undertaking to vacate the premises unconditionally dependent on the verdict in the Appeal Suit. It is made clear that no persons other than the petitioner, his wife and children are permitted to so occupy as licensees. Such occupation as licensees will not confer any special right on the petitioner, his wife and children in the ultimate O.P (C) No.1563 of 2014 2 disposal of the Appeal Suit. The Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge. nj.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial