Devender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Devender Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jul 08, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1155385

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1155385
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jul 08, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devender Kumar

Respondent

State of Haryana and Others

Excerpt

cwp no.12715 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.12715 of 2014 date of decision: 08.07.2014 devender kumar ..petitioner(s) versus state of haryana and others ..respondent(s) coram: hon'ble mr.justice paramjeet singh1 whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.2) to be referred to the reporters or not ?.3) whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. present: mr.i.s.pabla, advocate for the petitioner.paramjeet singh, j. (oral) instant writ petition has been filed under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india for quashing the letter no.2285 (annexure p-4) dated 19.01.2009, issued by respondent no.3 intimating that advance rent of 11 months has been exhausted upto 16.04.2008 and raising the impugned demand of rent with interest and penalty upto the month of december, 2008 without delivering the possession of the shop. i have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. kumar parveen 2014.07.14 12:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.12715 of 2014 2 there is no document on record to show the terms of auction which was carried out as is evident from the judgment dated 12.03.2012 passed in cwp no.20554 of 2010, titled 'vijay kumar versus state of haryana and others'. reference has been made to terms and conditions of the auction notice which provide that possession of the shop would be delivered within three months to the tenants, but in the present case, no such auction notice been placed on record. having realized the same, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh after annexing all the relevant documents. dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 08.07.2014 (paramjeet singh) parveen kumar judge kumar parveen 2014.07.14 12:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CWP No.12715 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12715 of 2014 Date of Decision: 08.07.2014 Devender Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?.

Present: Mr.I.S.Pabla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Paramjeet Singh, J.

(Oral) Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the letter No.2285 (Annexure P-4) dated 19.01.2009, issued by respondent no.3 intimating that advance rent of 11 months has been exhausted upto 16.04.2008 and raising the impugned demand of rent with interest and penalty upto the month of December, 2008 without delivering the possession of the shop.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

Kumar Parveen 2014.07.14 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.12715 of 2014 2 There is no document on record to show the terms of auction which was carried out as is evident from the judgment dated 12.03.2012 passed in CWP No.20554 of 2010, titled 'Vijay Kumar versus State of Haryana and others'.

Reference has been made to terms and conditions of the auction notice which provide that possession of the shop would be delivered within three months to the tenants, but in the present case, no such auction notice been placed on record.

Having realized the same, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh after annexing all the relevant documents.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

08.07.2014 (Paramjeet Singh) parveen kumar Judge Kumar Parveen 2014.07.14 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Devender Kumar vs State of Haryana and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition