Rajiv Kumar Vs. State and ors

Rajiv Kumar vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jul 11, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1155364

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1155364
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On: Jul 11, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajiv Kumar

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

.....kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, direction or order:- a. the impugned rejection letter dated 11.06.2014 (annexure-p/8) may kindly be quashed and set aside.b.the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature and selection of the humble petitioner and accordingly pass a fresh order.c.cost of the writ petition may kindly be s.b.civil writ petition no.5007/2014 rajiv kumar versus state of rajasthan & ors.order dt: 11/07/2014 2/2 awarded to the humble petitioner.d.any other writ, order or direction which this hon'ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner.”. 2. the petitioner's selection on the post of head master since has been rejected by a non-speaking order passed by the assistant secretary of the rajasthan public service commission vide the order impugned (annex.p/8) dated 11.06.2014 as according to the petitioner, he possess the requisite teaching experience to his credit, therefore, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty and direction to the petitioner to approach the respondent, secretary, rajasthan public service commission, by a suitable representation with relevant evidence and the said secretary is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order after giving him an opportunity of hearing within a period of one week from the date of submitting such representation. 3. with these observations and directions, the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. no orders as to costs. a copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (dr. vineet kothari).j. dj/- 11

Full Judgment

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5007/2014 Rajiv Kumar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dt: 11/07/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5007/2014 Rajiv Kumar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 11th July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.

JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.L.S.Jodha, for the petitioner.

-- BY THE COURT: 1.

By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order (Annex.P/8) dated 11.06.2014, whereby his selection to the post of Head Master has been rejected.

The petitioner in the present writ petition has sought following relief/s: - “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, direction or order:- a.

the impugned rejection letter dated 11.06.2014 (Annexure-P/8) may kindly be quashed and set aside.b.the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature and selection of the humble petitioner and accordingly pass a fresh order.c.cost of the writ petition may kindly be S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5007/2014 Rajiv Kumar versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dt: 11/07/2014 2/2 awarded to the humble petitioner.d.any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner.”

The petitioner's selection on the post of Head Master since has been rejected by a non-speaking order passed by the Assistant Secretary of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission vide the order impugned (Annex.P/8) dated 11.06.2014 as according to the petitioner, he possess the requisite teaching experience to his credit, therefore, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty and direction to the petitioner to approach the respondent, Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, by a suitable representation with relevant evidence and the said Secretary is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order after giving him an opportunity of hearing within a period of one week from the date of submitting such representation.

With these observations and directions, the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

No orders as to costs.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith.

(Dr.

VINEET KOTHARI).J.

DJ/- 11

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2014 Same Parties Rajiv Kumar vs State and ors Same Subject Land Acquisition