Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

“heard. Vs. the State of Punjab

“heard. vs The State of Punjab

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jul 09, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1154961

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

“heard.

Respondent

The State of Punjab

Excerpt

.....dag, punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent- state. a complete copy of the petition has been furnished to learned state counsel. list on 09.07.2014. in the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to join investigation and to appear before the investigating officer on 14.05.2014 at 11 a.m.in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the kanchan arresting officer/ investigating officer. the petitioner 2014.07.09 17:19 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-15077 of 2014 2 shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and he shall remain bound by the conditions as envisaged under section 438(2) cr.p.c.”. learned state counsel upon instructions from si gurdial singh would apprise the court that the petitioner has since joined investigation. that apart, a perusal of the fir would reveal that the allegations were primarily against co-accused mohinder singh as regards mis-appropriation of govt. wheat stock. insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, he has been implicated during the cours.of investigation on the basis that such mis-appropriated wheat stock has further been sold to him. it has gone unrebutted that main accused mohinder singh has been granted the benefit of regular bail by this court in the light of order dated 08.05.2014 passed in crm no.m-43478 of 2013. in the totality of circumstances and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already joined investigation, custodial interrogation would not be warranted. accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 08.05.2014 passed by this court is made absolute. petition disposed of. july 09, 2014. (tejinder singh dhindsa) kanchan judge kanchan 2014.07.09 17:19 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

CRM No.M-15077 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15077 of 2014.

Date of Decision : 09.07.2014.

Satish Mohan ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.

Present: Mr.Parshotam Lal Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

*** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.

(Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner during pendency of trial in case FIR No.72 dated 29.9.2013 under Section 409 IPC, registered at Police Station City Banga, District SBS Nagar.

On 08.05.2014, while issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court :- “Heard.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.K.S.Sidhu, learned DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent- State.

A complete copy of the petition has been furnished to learned State counsel.

List on 09.07.2014.

In the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to join investigation and to appear before the Investigating Officer on 14.05.2014 at 11 A.M.In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Kanchan Arresting Officer/ Investigating Officer.

The petitioner 2014.07.09 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-15077 of 2014 2 shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and he shall remain bound by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”

.

Learned State counsel upon instructions from SI Gurdial Singh would apprise the Court that the petitioner has since joined investigation.

That apart, a perusal of the FIR would reveal that the allegations were primarily against co-accused Mohinder Singh as regards mis-appropriation of Govt.

wheat stock.

Insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, he has been implicated during the couRs.of investigation on the basis that such mis-appropriated wheat stock has further been sold to him.

It has gone unrebutted that main accused Mohinder Singh has been granted the benefit of regular bail by this Court in the light of order dated 08.05.2014 passed in CRM No.M-43478 of 2013.

In the totality of circumstances and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already joined investigation, custodial interrogation would not be warranted.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 08.05.2014 passed by this Court is made absolute.

Petition disposed of.

July 09, 2014.

(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) kanchan JUDGE Kanchan 2014.07.09 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial