Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Uma Devi and Another Vs. the Officer In-charge and Others

Uma Devi and Another vs The Officer In-charge and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai Decided Feb 12, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1149885

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
O.A. No. 155 of 2013
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Uma Devi and Another

Advocate M/s. F.X. Eugene

Respondent

The Officer In-charge and Others

Excerpt

.....has been filed by the applicant for the grant of maintenance out of the pay and allowances of the 5th respondent available with the respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7. in view of the compromise reached in between the parties (i.e.applicants and 5th respondent) and the joint compromise memorandum has been recorded, there is no need to pass any order on merit. the first applicant and the 5th respondent have agreed in the joint compromise memorandum, to cohabit at the house of the 5th respondent for the welfare of the second applicant. therefore, we are obliged to pass orders in terms of the compromise reached between applicants and 5th respondent in the joint memorandum of compromise filed by them. accordingly, the terminal benefits payable by the respondents- 1 to 4, 6 and 7to the 5th respondent except the arrears of pay and allowances available with the respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7 and the remaining pension after commutation if opted, shall be deposited into this tribunal, in order to invest the said money in the name of the second applicant, the minor son of the first applicant and the 5th respondent till he attains the age of majority. the respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7 are therefore directed to issue ppo in favour of 5th respondent, within a period of one month from today, except the other retiral benefits, namely, gratuity, encashment of leave salary, commuted pension, army group insurance and provident fund savings. the retirement benefits shall also be released within the said period, so as to deposit before this tribunal for the purpose of depositing in the name of the second applicant in the fixed deposit (re-investment scheme) in state bank of india, sankarankoil branch. 3. the original application is accordingly disposed of in terms of joint memorandum of compromise. the terms of compromise in the joint memorandum of compromise shall form part of this order.

Full Judgment

V. Periya Karuppiah, Member (Judicial):

1. Amendment carried out. Amended copy of Original Application is filed. Both the first applicant and the 5th respondent are present before this Tribunal. The learned counsel Ms. S.Kalaiselvi representing M/s F.X. Eugene and G.Thaveethu, counsel for the applicants and Mr. M.Selvaraj, learned counsel for the 5th respondent submit that the applicants and the 5th respondent are willing to go for a counselling in order to enter into a compromise between them. Accordingly, the first applicant and the 5th respondent entered into a counselling at our chambers in our presence and also in the presence of the learned counsel for the applicants, 5th respondent and learned Senior Panel Counsel along with learned Assistant JAG Officer. At the end of the counselling, they have entered into a compromise and they filed a joint memorandum in the afternoon, before Tribunal. The Joint Compromise Memorandum has been read over to the first applicant who represents on behalf of 2nd applicant also and the 5th respondent and they have admitted the terms of compromise entered therein. Accordingly, the Joint Compromise Memorandum is recorded.

2. The Original Application has been filed by the applicant for the grant of maintenance out of the pay and allowances of the 5th respondent available with the respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7. In view of the compromise reached in between the parties (i.e.Applicants and 5th respondent) and the Joint Compromise Memorandum has been recorded, there is no need to pass any order on merit. The first applicant and the 5th respondent have agreed in the Joint Compromise Memorandum, to cohabit at the house of the 5th respondent for the welfare of the second applicant. Therefore, we are obliged to pass orders in terms of the compromise reached between applicants and 5th respondent in the Joint Memorandum of Compromise filed by them. Accordingly, the terminal benefits payable by the respondents- 1 to 4, 6 and 7to the 5th respondent except the arrears of pay and allowances available with the respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7 and the remaining pension after commutation if opted, shall be deposited into this Tribunal, in order to invest the said money in the name of the second applicant, the minor son of the first applicant and the 5th respondent till he attains the age of majority. The respondents-1 to 4, 6 and 7 are therefore directed to issue PPO in favour of 5th respondent, within a period of one month from today, except the other retiral benefits, namely, gratuity, encashment of leave salary, commuted pension, Army Group Insurance and Provident Fund savings. The retirement benefits shall also be released within the said period, so as to deposit before this Tribunal for the purpose of depositing in the name of the second applicant in the Fixed Deposit (Re-investment Scheme) in State Bank of India, Sankarankoil Branch.

3. The Original Application is accordingly disposed of in terms of Joint Memorandum of Compromise. The terms of compromise in the Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of this order.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial