Sarika Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Board, Represented Through Chairman, Delhi and Others

Sarika vs Delhi Subordinate Services Board, Represented Through Chairman, Delhi and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi Decided May 27, 2014

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1149128

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1149128
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Judge: The Honourable Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) &Amp; the Honourable Mr. V.N. Gaur, Member (a)
Decided On: May 27, 2014
Case Number: O.A. No.1855 of 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarika

Respondent

Delhi Subordinate Services Board, Represented Through Chairman, Delhi and Others

Excerpt

(oral). v. ajay kumar, member (j). 1. heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. it is the case of the applicant that in pursuance of an advertisement issued by the respondents for selection to the post of primary teacher in mcd, post code no.16/08, she applied under st category and participated in the selection process, and the respondents have found her qualified and selected vide their final merit list of candidates (annexure d). however, till date the respondents have not issued the appointment letter to the applicant. 3. it is further submitted that the applicant submitted representation dated 14.02.2014 espousing her grievances. however, the respondents have not passed any orders thereon till date. 4. in the circumstances, the o.a. is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without going into the other merits of the case, by directing the respondents to consider the representation of the applicant and to pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order thereon, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

(Oral).

V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J).

1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

2. It is the case of the applicant that in pursuance of an Advertisement issued by the respondents for selection to the post of Primary Teacher in MCD, Post Code No.16/08, she applied under ST category and participated in the selection process, and the respondents have found her qualified and selected vide their final merit list of candidates (Annexure D). However, till date the respondents have not issued the appointment letter to the applicant.

3. It is further submitted that the applicant submitted representation dated 14.02.2014 espousing her grievances. However, the respondents have not passed any orders thereon till date.

4. In the circumstances, the O.A. is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without going into the other merits of the case, by directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the applicant and to pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order thereon, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi · ... Same Parties Sarika vs Delhi Subordinate Services Board, Represented Throu... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Mr. V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) &Amp; the Honour...