Bijay Kumar Verma Vs. Consortium for Education Communication, New Delhi and Others

Bijay Kumar Verma vs Consortium for Education Communication, New Delhi and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi Decided May 28, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1149113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1149113
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Judge: The Honourable Mr. G. George Paracken, Member (J) &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Shekhar Agarwal, Member (a)
Decided On: May 28, 2014
Case Number: OA No.1884 of 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 14 (2);

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bijay Kumar Verma

Respondent

Consortium for Education Communication, New Delhi and Others

Excerpt

administrative tribunals act, 1985 - section 14 (2); (oral). g. george paracken, member (j): 1. the applicant has filed this oa against the order dated 7.5.2013 passed by the consortium for education communication (an inter university centre of university grants commission on electronic media) iuac (nsc) campus, aruna asaf ali marg, new delhi and director governing board consortium for educational communication (an inter university centre of university grants commission on electronic media) iuac (nsc) campus, aruna asaf ali marg, new delhi and others. 2. we have heard learned counsel for the applicant on the question of jurisdiction to entertain this original application. he agreed that the respondent consortium for education communication is not a notified organisation under section 14 (2) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 which reads as under:- (2). the central government may, by notification, apply with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification the provisions of sub-section (3) to local or other authorities within the territory of india or under the control of the government of india and to corporations [or societies] owned or controller by government, not being a local or other authority or corporation [or society] controller or owned by a state government: provided that if the central government considers it expedient so to do for the purpose of facilitating transition to the scheme as envisaged by this act, different dates may be so specified under sub-section in respect of different classes of or different categories under any class of, local or other authorities or corporations [or societies]. 3. he has, therefore, requested to allow him to withdraw this oa so that he may approach the appropriate forum. accordingly, this oa is dismissed as withdrawn. there shall be no order as to cost.

Full Judgment

(Oral).

G. George Paracken, Member (J):

1. The applicant has filed this OA against the order dated 7.5.2013 passed by the Consortium for Education Communication (An Inter University Centre of University Grants Commission on Electronic Media) IUAC (NSC) Campus, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi and Director Governing Board Consortium for Educational Communication (An Inter University Centre of University Grants Commission on Electronic Media) IUAC (NSC) Campus, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi and others.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant on the question of jurisdiction to entertain this Original Application. He agreed that the respondent Consortium for Education Communication is not a notified Organisation under Section 14 (2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 which reads as under:-

(2). The Central Government may, by notification, apply with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification the provisions of sub-section (3) to local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India and to corporations [or societies] owned or controller by Government, not being a local or other authority or corporation [or society] controller or owned by a State Government:

Provided that if the Central Government considers it expedient so to do for the purpose of facilitating transition to the scheme as envisaged by this Act, different dates may be so specified under sub-section in respect of different classes of or different categories under any class of, local or other authorities or corporations [or societies].

3. He has, therefore, requested to allow him to withdraw this OA so that he may approach the appropriate forum. Accordingly, this OA is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to cost.

Same Court & Year Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi · ... Same Parties Bijay Kumar Verma vs Consortium for Education Communication, ... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Mr. G. George Paracken, Member (J) &Amp; the H...

Education