Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C. I. T. Iv, Kolkata Vs. K. N. D. Engineerins Technologies Ltd.

C. I. T. Iv, Kolkata vs K. N. D. Engineerins Technologies Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jun 02, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1143613

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C. I. T. Iv, Kolkata

Respondent

K. N. D. Engineerins Technologies Ltd.

Excerpt

order sheet in the high court at calcutta special jurisdiction [income tax].original side ita no.285 of 2004 c.i.t. - iv, kolkata versus k.n.d. engineerins technologies ltd.before: the hon'ble justice girish chandra gupta the hon'ble justice sudip ahluwalia date : 2nd june, 2014. appearance: mr.p.k. bhowmick, advocate mr.n.k. poddar, senior advocate the court : mr.bhowmick, learned advocate, is present on behalf of the appellant. no one appeared for the respondent. it is an appeal of 2004 which appears to have been admitted on 29th march, 2012. there is, however, nothing to show that any notice of appeal was served. we, by our order dated 16th 2014, directed the department to enlighten us on the subject. the department has furnished a report. the department is directed to produce all the original records on the basis whereof the reported dated 17th may, 2014 was prepared by them. under section 147 read with section 149 of the income tax, there is a complete bar prohibiting reopening of cases after expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. the period of limitation for preferring an appeal is 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. from the pendency list furnished to us by the department of this court, it appears that appeals of the year 1999 and onwards are pending. most of such appeals were filed but steps thereafter were not taken to prosecute them. in some cases the appeals are yet to be admitted and in some cases notice of appeal is yet to be served. the desirability of these appeals being entertained after such a long time requires an in-depth consideration. mr.poddar, learned senior advocate, is appointed amicus curie in the matter. let the matter be listed on 7th july, 2014. (girish chandra gupta, j.) (sudip ahluwalia, j.) sm ar[cr].

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax].ORIGINAL SIDE ITA No.285 of 2004 C.I.T.

- IV, KOLKATA Versus K.N.D.

ENGINEERINS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Date : 2nd June, 2014.

Appearance: Mr.P.K.

Bhowmick, Advocate Mr.N.K.

Poddar, Senior Advocate The Court : Mr.Bhowmick, learned Advocate, is present on behalf of the appellant.

No one appeared for the respondent.

It is an appeal of 2004 which appears to have been admitted on 29th March, 2012.

There is, however, nothing to show that any notice of appeal was served.

We, by our order dated 16th 2014, directed the department to enlighten us on the subject.

The department has furnished a report.

The department is directed to produce all the original records on the basis whereof the reported dated 17th May, 2014 was prepared by them.

Under Section 147 read with Section 149 of the Income Tax, there is a complete bar prohibiting reopening of cases after expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year.

The period of limitation for preferring an appeal is 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

From the pendency list furnished to us by the department of this Court, it appears that appeals of the year 1999 and onwards are pending.

Most of such appeals were filed but steps thereafter were not taken to prosecute them.

In some cases the appeals are yet to be admitted and in some cases notice of appeal is yet to be served.

The desirability of these appeals being entertained after such a long time requires an in-depth consideration.

Mr.Poddar, learned Senior Advocate, is appointed amicus curie in the matter.

Let the matter be listed on 7th July, 2014.

(GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.) (SUDIP AHLUWALIA, J.) sm AR[CR].

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial