Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayan Vs. State of Kerala

Jayan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 04, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1143460

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....learned magistrate has taken the case on file as c.p.no.100 of 2013.3. learned counsel submits that the allegations against the petitioner are not true. it is submitted that allegation against the petitioner is only that he assaulted the de facto complainant with hand. it is not correct to say that the petitioner was absconding.4. having regard to the fact that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, i am inclined to grant relief but subject to conditions. resultantly this application is disposed of as under: (i) petitioner is granted bail in crime no.934 of 2013 of the nooranad police station (c.p.no.100 of 2013 of the judicial first class b.a.no.2943 of 2014 2 magistrate court-ii, mavelikkara). (ii) petitioner shall surrender before the learned judicial first class magistrate, mavelikkara on or before 12.06.2014. (ii) on such surrender the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for `20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: (a) one of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner. (b) petitioner shall surrender his passport before the learned magistrate while executing the bail bond and in case he has none, file affidavit to that effect. (c) petitioner shall report to the officer who has investigated the case if and when required for investigation. (d) petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. (e) petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses. (f) in case the petitioner violates any of condition nos.(c) to (e), it is open to the investigating officer to move the learned magistrate (until committal if any, and thereafter b.a.no.2943 of 2014 3 before the learned principal sessions judge concerned) for cancellation of the bail as held in p.k shaji vs. state of kerala (air 2006 sc100. (f) in.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE4H DAY OF JUNE201414TH JYAISHTA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 2943 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 934/2013 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/ 3rd ACCUSED: ---------------------- JAYAN AGED35YEARS S/O.VELUTHAKUNJU, ELLUVILA VADAKKETHIL MUTHUKKATTUKARA MURI, PALAMMEL, ALAPPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.MANU ROY RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER NOORANAD POLICE STATION BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR: ADV. LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0406-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.

========================= B.A.No.2943 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 04th day of June, 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is the third accused in Crime No.934 of 2013 of the Nooranad Police Station for the offences punishable under Secs.341, 323, 324, 308 and 506(i) r/w Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner was absconding and a final report was filed in the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Mavelikkara. Learned magistrate has taken the case on file as C.P.No.100 of 2013.

3. Learned counsel submits that the allegations against the petitioner are not true. It is submitted that allegation against the petitioner is only that he assaulted the de facto complainant with hand. It is not correct to say that the petitioner was absconding.

4. Having regard to the fact that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, I am inclined to grant relief but subject to conditions. Resultantly this application is disposed of as under: (i) Petitioner is granted bail in Crime No.934 of 2013 of the Nooranad Police Station (C.P.No.100 of 2013 of the Judicial First Class B.A.No.2943 of 2014 2 Magistrate Court-II, Mavelikkara). (ii) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mavelikkara on or before 12.06.2014. (ii) On such surrender the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for `20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: (a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner. (b) Petitioner shall surrender his passport before the learned magistrate while executing the bail bond and in case he has none, file affidavit to that effect. (c) Petitioner shall report to the officer who has investigated the case if and when required for investigation. (d) Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. (e) Petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses. (f) In case the petitioner violates any of condition Nos.(c) to (e), it is open to the investigating officer to move the learned magistrate (until committal if any, and thereafter B.A.No.2943 of 2014 3 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned) for cancellation of the bail as held in P.K Shaji Vs. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC100. (f) In case the petitioner surrenders the passport as aforesaid and it is required to be returned for any purpose, application for the same may be preferred before the learned magistrate/Principal Sessions Judge as aforesaid. Sd/- THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE. Sbna True Copy P A to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial