Deva Ram Vs. State and ors

Deva Ram vs State and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided May 20, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1143427

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1143427
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On: May 20, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deva Ram

Respondent

State and ors

Excerpt

.....the following order has been passed :- “the petitioners no.1 and 2 i.e.smt. renuka and sharwan paliwal respectively present in person and state that they voluntarily solemnized the marriage on 01.05.2014 at delhi and after marriage, when they reached their village, the respondents no.4 to 9 threatened to kill them and, therefore, they filed this criminal misc. petition before this court for providing police protection. issue notice. learned public prosecutor is directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondents no.1, 2 and 3. issue notice to the respondents no.4 to 9 only. notices are made returnable on 15.05.2014. mr.gautam jain, sho, police station, udaimandir, jodhpur, present in person, is directed to provide protection to the petitioners no.1 and 2 for their safe passage from jodhpur to their village bhandiyawas. put up on 15.05.2014.”. a confident statement is also made by ms.renuka before us that she voluntarily left her house and entered into a wedlock with mr.sharwan paliwal. in view of the factual position noticed above, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of by keeping ms.renuka at liberty to move as per her free will and wishes. [atul kumar jain]., j. [govind mathur]., j. pramod

Full Judgment

[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER

D.B.CIVIL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) PETITION NO.3453/2014 Devaram Versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 20.05.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr.C.R.Choudhary for the applicant Mr.Shiv Kumar Vyas - Government Advocate Mr.Gopal Acharya for the alleged detenue BY THE COURT : Alleging illegal detention of Ms.Renuka, this habeas corpus petition is preferred to have a direction to produce the corpus before the court.

Ms.Renuka at her own, while availing police protection as given under S.B.Criminal Misc.

Petition No.1118/2014, Smt.

Renuka & ORS.versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors., appeared before us.

It is submitted by her that she has already solemnized marriage on 01.05.2014 with Mr.Sharwan Paliwal, resident of Village Bhandiyawas, Tehsil Pachpadra, District Barmer.

She also disclosed that having apprehension for danger to her life, she preferred a miscellaneous petition as per [2].the provisions of Section 482 Cr PC, wherein the following order has been passed :- “The petitioners No.1 and 2 i.e.Smt.

Renuka and Sharwan Paliwal respectively present in person and state that they voluntarily solemnized the marriage on 01.05.2014 at Delhi and after marriage, when they reached their village, the respondents No.4 to 9 threatened to kill them and, therefore, they filed this Criminal Misc.

Petition before this Court for providing police protection.

Issue notice.

Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondents No.1, 2 and 3.

Issue notice to the respondents No.4 to 9 only.

Notices are made returnable on 15.05.2014.

Mr.Gautam Jain, SHO, Police Station, Udaimandir, Jodhpur, present in person, is directed to provide protection to the petitioners No.1 and 2 for their safe passage from Jodhpur to their village Bhandiyawas.

Put up on 15.05.2014.”

A confident statement is also made by Ms.Renuka before us that she voluntarily left her house and entered into a wedlock with Mr.Sharwan Paliwal.

In view of the factual position noticed above, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of by keeping Ms.Renuka at liberty to move as per her free will and wishes.

[ATUL KUMAR JAIN]., J.

[GOVIND MATHUR]., J.

Pramod

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2014 Same Parties Deva Ram vs State and ors Same Subject Land Acquisition