Satwinder Kaur Vs. V.

Satwinder Kaur vs V.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 14, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1143304

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1143304
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: May 14, 2014
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satwinder Kaur

Respondent

Excerpt

.....primarily raising two grounds, namely, disability of the petitioner and that her husband is working at gurdaspur. learned counsel for the state has produced in court an order dated 14.5.2014 transferring the petitioner to primary health centre, dhianpur, district gurdaspur. though learned counsel for the state, on instructions from sandeep kumar, senior assistant, submitted that distance of dhianpur from gurdaspur is about 30-35 kilometers.whereas counsel for the petitioner submitted that the distance is about 60 kilometers.be that as it may, as the petitioner has now been transferred to a place, which is in district gurdaspur, at a distance less than the place of posting given to the petitioner, which has been impugned in the present kumar manoj 2014.05.26 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.4738 of 2014 [2].petition, she may join at the present place. however, considering her disability and the fact that her husband is working in district treasury at gurdaspur, she shall be at liberty to move a representation to the authorities for consideration of her case at the time of general transfers.the petition stands disposed of. (rajesh bindal) judge 14.5.2014 mk kumar manoj 2014.05.26 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CWP No.4738 of 2014 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4738 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.5.2014 Satwinder Kaur .Petitioner v.

State of Punjab and others .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Anshul Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

Rajesh Bindal J.

The petitioner approached this Court with a grievance that she is 55% disabled and working as Multi Purpose Health Worker.

She was promoted and transferred from Civil Hospital, Gurdaspur to Civil Hospital, Rampura, District Bhatinda at a distance of about 150 kilometers from the present place of posting.

Her husband is working as Clerk in District Treasury at Gurdaspur.

The transfer order was challenged primarily raising two grounds, namely, disability of the petitioner and that her husband is working at Gurdaspur.

Learned counsel for the State has produced in court an order dated 14.5.2014 transferring the petitioner to Primary Health Centre, Dhianpur, District Gurdaspur.

Though learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Sandeep Kumar, Senior Assistant, submitted that distance of Dhianpur from Gurdaspur is about 30-35 kilometeRs.whereas counsel for the petitioner submitted that the distance is about 60 kilometeRs.Be that as it may, as the petitioner has now been transferred to a place, which is in District Gurdaspur, at a distance less than the place of posting given to the petitioner, which has been impugned in the present Kumar Manoj 2014.05.26 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.4738 of 2014 [2].petition, she may join at the present place.

However, considering her disability and the fact that her husband is working in District Treasury at Gurdaspur, she shall be at liberty to move a representation to the authorities for consideration of her case at the time of general transfeRs.The petition stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Bindal) Judge 14.5.2014 mk Kumar Manoj 2014.05.26 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Satwinder Kaur vs V. Same Subject Land Acquisition