Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnan K.T. Vs. Deepak

Krishnan K.T. vs Deepak

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 22, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1142064

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan K.T.

Respondent

Deepak

Excerpt

.....on the file of the motor accidents claims tribunal, thrissur. exhibit p4 : true copy of the order in i.a no.6344/2013 in op(m.v) no.1429/2010 passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, thrissur dated2908.2013. exhibit p5 : true copy of the order in i.a. no.6339/2013 in in op(mv) no.1430/2010 passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, thrissur dated2908.2013. exhibit p6 : true copy of the order in cmp no.1601/2014 passed by the chief judicial magistrate court, thrissur dated2204.2014. respondent(s)' exhibits: ----------------------------------------- n i l /true copy/ p.a.to judge kss k.surendra mohan, j.--------------------------------------------- o.p.(mac) nos.65 & 67 of 2014 ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 22nd day of may, 2014 judgment the petitioners husband and wife have filed these original petitions challenging an order of the motor accidents claims tribunal, thrissur declining their request to have op(mv) no.1429 of 2010 and op(mv) no.1430 of 2010, disposed of on an early date, overlooking the priority position. the tribunal has found that the petitioners have not suffered any serious injuries in the accident and that there were no circumstances justifying their claim for having their cases taken out of turn. i find no grounds to interfere with the impugned orders.2. the counsel for the petitioners submits that proceedings for recovery of amounts due from the husband are being pursued vigorously by m/s dhanalakshmi bank ltd and that, the amount that they may be able to obtain as compensation for the injuries suffered could be utilised to -:2:- o.p.(mac) nos.65 & 67 of 2014 ward off the recovery proceedings. according to the counsel, the insurance company is not raising any serious disputes in the matter and that an award could be passed, upon a reference to the adalat. the petitioners shall be at liberty to request the motor accidents claims tribunal, thrissur for listing the matters before the next.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE22D DAYOF MAY20141ST JYAISHTA, 1936 OP (MAC).No. 65 of 2014 (O) ---------------------------- I.A.NO.6339/2013 IN OP(MV)NO.1430/2010 OF MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR. .... PETITIONER: --------------------- KRISHNAN K.T., S/O.THAYYAN, KANNAMPULLY HOUSE, PRINGANOOR DESOM, PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DEEPAK, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN K.T., KOLAMBRATH HOUSE, KAIPARAMBU P.O., PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR - 680 501.

2. MANIKANDAN, S/O. KARAPPAN, VETTIKATTIL HOUSE, PERINGANOOR DESOM, PERAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR - 680 545.

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., PARK HOUSE BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, ROUND NORTH, THRISSUR - 680 001. R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD THIS OP (MAC) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2205-2014 ALONG WITH OP(MAC) NO.67/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss OP (MAC).No. 65 of 2014 (O) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ---------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE CLIAM APPLICATION IN OP(MV) NO.1430/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR DATED1706.2010. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY ASWINI HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., THRISSUR DATED2010.2009. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO.6339/2013 IN OP(MV) NO.1430/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE

ORDER

IN I.A NO.6344/2013 IN OP(M.V) NO.1429/2010 PASSED BY THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR DATED2908.2013. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE

ORDER

IN I.A. NO.6339/2013 IN IN OP(MV) NO.1430/2010 PASSED BY THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR DATED2908.2013. EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE

ORDER

IN CMP NO.1601/2014 PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR DATED2204.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: ----------------------------------------- N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

--------------------------------------------- O.P.(MAC) Nos.65 & 67 of 2014 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2014

JUDGMENT

The petitioners husband and wife have filed these original petitions challenging an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur declining their request to have OP(MV) No.1429 of 2010 and OP(MV) No.1430 of 2010, disposed of on an early date, overlooking the priority position. The Tribunal has found that the petitioners have not suffered any serious injuries in the accident and that there were no circumstances justifying their claim for having their cases taken out of turn. I find no grounds to interfere with the impugned orders.

2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that proceedings for recovery of amounts due from the husband are being pursued vigorously by M/s Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd and that, the amount that they may be able to obtain as compensation for the injuries suffered could be utilised to -:2:- O.P.(MAC) Nos.65 & 67 of 2014 ward off the recovery proceedings. According to the counsel, the Insurance Company is not raising any serious disputes in the matter and that an Award could be passed, upon a reference to the Adalat. The petitioners shall be at liberty to request the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur for listing the matters before the next available Adalat. If such a request is made, I am sure that the request would be entertained and necessary orders passed thereon, without delay. These original petitions are disposed of with the above directions. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE kkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial