Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Om Prakash Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Om Prakash vs State of Raj. and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided May 29, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1141847

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Om Prakash

Respondent

State of Raj. and ors

Excerpt

s.b.c.w.p.no.3786/2014 om prakash versus state of rajasthan & ors.order dated: 29.05.2014 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b.civil writ petition no.3786/2014 om prakash versus state of rajasthan & ors.date of order :::: 29th may, 2014 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari appearance: mr.r.j.punia, for the petitioner. -- by the court: 1. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controvers.involved in the present case has been decided by this court in the case of ashok godara versus state & ors.- sbcwp no.3503/2014 decided on 22.05.2014, in which this court has held as under: - “14. as far as computer operators are concerned, there is no dispute that with a different name and designation known as “information assistants”. the regular selection process has already been held by the state government in the year 2013 and since the regularly selected persons or information assistants became available for the post of computer operat ors.some of the present petitioners.who are computer operat ors.cannot s.b.c.w.p.no.3786/2014 om prakash versus state of rajasthan & ors.order dated: 29.05.2014 2/2 claim any preferential right over the regularly selected and appointed computer operators/information assistants. 15. this court is, therefore, of the considered opinion that present set of writ petitions do not have any merit & deserve to be dismissed and no mandamus direction can be given to the respondent state to extend the term of contractual employment of the pharmacists employed through agencies other than rmrs.computer operators and helpers working in the various ddcs, run and operated by the state government under the chief minister's free medical aid scheme. 16. consequently, the writ petitions are hereby dismissed. no costs. copy of the order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith.”. 2. the present writ petition is accordingly dismissed in same terms.a copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties.....

Full Judgment

S.B.C.W.P.No.3786/2014 Om Prakash versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dated: 29.05.2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3786/2014 Om Prakash versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :::: 29th May, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.

JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.R.J.Punia, for the petitioner.

-- BY THE COURT: 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controveRs.involved in the present case has been decided by this Court in the case of Ashok Godara versus State & ORS.- SBCWP No.3503/2014 decided on 22.05.2014, in which this Court has held as under: - “14.

As far as Computer Operators are concerned, there is no dispute that with a different name and designation known as “Information Assistants”.

the regular selection process has already been held by the State Government in the year 2013 and since the regularly selected persons or Information Assistants became available for the post of Computer Operat ORS.some of the present petitioneRs.who are Computer Operat ORS.cannot S.B.C.W.P.No.3786/2014 Om Prakash versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dated: 29.05.2014 2/2 claim any preferential right over the regularly selected and appointed Computer Operators/Information Assistants.

15.

This Court is, therefore, of the considered opinion that present set of writ petitions do not have any merit & deserve to be dismissed and no mandamus direction can be given to the respondent State to extend the term of contractual employment of the Pharmacists employed through agencies other than RMRS.Computer Operators and Helpers working in the various DDCs, run and operated by the State Government under the Chief Minister's Free Medical Aid Scheme.

16.

Consequently, the writ petitions are hereby dismissed.

No costs.

Copy of the order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith.”

.

2.

The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed in same terMs.A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith.

(Dr.

VINEET KOTHARI).J.

DJ/- 16

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial