Full Judgment
2. The lower Appellate authority has held that the disputed item was covered by Clause 1(c) of the Explanation to Rule 57Q by treating them in the nature of weigh bridges and it is against this finding, that the Revenue has filed the present appeal on the ground that weigh bridges are different and distinct from weighing machines.
3. While agreeing with the department that weighing machines cannot be equated with weigh bridges, I find that the disputed item is covered by Clause 1(b) (sic) of the Explanation to Rule 57Q as the Electronic Weighing machines can be regarded as components or accessories of the bottling plant which in turn, are admittedly of producing goods viz.
cold drinks and therefore, the credit is available to the respondents on this item. In the result, I hold that the respondents are entitled to the benefit of credit of Rs. 4,333/- on Electronic weighing machines. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.